Paper · 2014

Effects of intercropping with Atractylodes lancea and application of bio-organic fertiliser on soil invertebrates, disease control and peanut productivity in continuous peanut cropping field in subtropical China

LiXing-xiang WangChuan-chao; DaiTao-lin Zhang; Xing-guang XieChang-feng; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The consecutive monoculturing of peanut seriously affects its yield and quality in the red soil regions of southern China. Different control measures for consecutively monocultured peanut fields should be explored to ensure the sustainable development of the local peanut industry. In this study, the influence of two different regimes, the intercropping of peanut with Atractylodes lancea and the furrow application of bio- organic fertiliser (BOF), on the community composi- tion of soil invertebrates, the severity of peanut disease and peanut productivity was evaluated in an upland region where peanut had been monocropping for 5 years. We found that intercropping with A. lancea and the furrow application of BOF significantly changed the community composition of soil inverte- brates and increased their biodiversity, as estimated by the Shannon and Simpson indices. Intercropping with A. lancea significantly reduced the proportion of Collembola, such as Tullbergia, Onychiurus, Folso- mia and Folsomina, while the furrow application of BOF significantly increased the abundance of Col- lembola, such as Isotomidae compared with conven- tional monoculture. The intercropping significantly increased the proportion of Acarina, such as Meso- stigmata and Oribatida, whereas the furrow applica- tion of BOF did not increase this proportion compared to conventional monoculture. The intercropping and application of BOF significantly reduced the damping- off in seedling and root rot disease at the maturation stage and increased peanut yield. The leaf spot disease of peanut was significantly suppressed by the inter- cropping but not by the application of BOF. The results of the study suggested that the intercropping of peanut with A. lancea and the furrow application of BOF could effectively relieve the problems associated with consecutive monoculture of peanut in the red soil regions of southern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping peanut with A. lancea significantly changed the community composition of soil invertebrates and increased their biodiversity (Shannon and Simpson indices).

Taxon
soil inverte- bratese1
Treatment
intercropping with A. lanceae0
Outcome
biodiversitye2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
as estimated by the Shannon and Simpson indicese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with A. lancea and the furrow application of BOF significantly changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil inverte- brates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–790 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased their biodiversity, as estimated by the Shannon and Simpson indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of bio-organic fertiliser significantly changed the community composition of soil invertebrates and increased their biodiversity (Shannon and Simpson indices).

Taxon
soil inverte- bratese1
Treatment
furrow application of BOFe0
Outcome
biodiversitye2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
as estimated by the Shannon and Simpson indicese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with A. lancea and the furrow application of BOF significantly changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil inverte- brates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–790 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased their biodiversity, as estimated by the Shannon and Simpson indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with A. lancea significantly reduced the proportion of Collembola such as Tullbergia, Onychiurus, Folsomia and Folsomina.

Taxon
CollembolaCollembolae0
Treatment
Intercropping with A. lanceae0
Outcome
proportion of Collembolae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with A. lancea significantly reduced the proportion of Collembola, such as Tullbergia, Onychiurus, Folso- mia and Folsomina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of BOF significantly increased the abundance of Collembola such as Isotomidae compared with conventional monoculture.

Taxon
Col- lembolae0
Treatment
furrow application of BOFe0
Outcome
abundancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conven- tional monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“the furrow application of BOF significantly increased the abundance of Col- lembola, such as Isotomidae compared with conven- tional monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased the proportion of Acarina such as Mesostigmata and Oribatida.

Taxon
AcarinaAcarie0
Treatment
The intercroppinge0
Outcome
proportion of Acarinae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping significantly increased the proportion of Acarina, such as Meso- stigmata and Oribatida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of BOF did not increase the proportion of Acarina compared with conventional monoculture.

Taxon
AcarinaAcarie0
Treatment
furrow applica- tion of BOFe1
Outcome
proportion of Acarinae0
Direction
did not increasee1
Comparator
conventional monoculturee1

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping significantly increased the proportion of Acarina, such as Meso- stigmata and Oribatida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“the furrow applica- tion of BOF did not increase this proportion compared to conventional monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced damping-off in seedlings and root rot disease at the maturation stage in peanut.

Organ / stage
maturation stagee0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
damping- off in seedling and root rot diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping and application of BOF significantly reduced the damping- off in seedling and root rot disease at the maturation stage and increased peanut yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of BOF significantly reduced damping-off in seedlings and root rot disease at the maturation stage in peanut.

Organ / stage
maturation stagee0
Treatment
application of BOFe0
Outcome
damping- off in seedling and root rot diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping and application of BOF significantly reduced the damping- off in seedling and root rot disease at the maturation stage and increased peanut yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased peanut yield.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
peanut yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping and application of BOF significantly reduced the damping- off in seedling and root rot disease at the maturation stage and increased peanut yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of BOF increased peanut yield.

Treatment
application of BOFe0
Outcome
peanut yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping and application of BOF significantly reduced the damping- off in seedling and root rot disease at the maturation stage and increased peanut yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut leaf spot disease was significantly suppressed by intercropping.

Treatment
inter- croppinge0
Outcome
leaf spot diseasee0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf spot disease of peanut was significantly suppressed by the inter- cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut leaf spot disease was not suppressed by application of BOF.

Treatment
application of BOFe0
Outcome
leaf spot diseasee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf spot disease of peanut was significantly suppressed by the inter- cropping but not by the application of BOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1665 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that intercropping peanut with A. lancea and furrow application of BOF could relieve the problems of consecutive peanut monoculture in the red soil regions of southern China.

Outcome
relieve the problems associated with consecutive monoculturee0
Setting
red soil regions of southern Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercropping of peanut with A. lancea and the furrow application of BOF could effectively relieve the problems associated with consecutive monoculture of peanut in the red soil regions of southern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1914 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

119 papers: 79 positive, 40 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

intercropping · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.