Paper · 2014 · Tobacco Science & Technology

Influences of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal(AM) Fungi Inoculation on Resistance of Tobacco to Bacterial Wilt

Liu Xianlian

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the influences of AM fungi(Glomus intraradicesand Glomus mosseae) on the resistance of tobacco to bacterial wilt(R. solan), a pot experiment was conducted to study the influences of AM fungi inoculation on the bacterial wilt disease incidence, the activity of peroxidase(POD) related to disease resistance and MDA content. The results showed that comparing with the CK, AM fungi inoculation could promote the growth of tobacco plants, the dry weight of and P content in tobacco shoot and roots, and N content in tobacco shoot increased significantly, and the disease incidence and index of bacterial wilt reduced. After R. solan inoculating, the POD activity of tobacco leaves inoculated with Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae increased by 22.9% and 26.9% respectively, compared with the CK(only inoculated with R. solan); meanwhile, MDA content declined; which indicated that AM fungi could promote the resistance of tobacco to bacterial wilt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi inoculation promoted tobacco growth relative to CK.

Treatment
AM fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
growth of tobacco plantse0
Direction
promotee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparing with the CK, AM fungi inoculation could promote the growth of tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices increased tobacco leaf POD activity by 22.9% versus CK.

Treatment
inoculated with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
R. solane0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
POD activity of tobacco leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.9%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the POD activity of tobacco leaves inoculated with Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae increased by 22.9% and 26.9% respectively, compared with the CK(only inoculated with R. solan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae increased tobacco leaf POD activity by 26.9% versus CK.

Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
R. solane0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
POD activity of tobacco leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.9%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the POD activity of tobacco leaves inoculated with Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae increased by 22.9% and 26.9% respectively, compared with the CK(only inoculated with R. solan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–841 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus intraradices · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.