Paper · 2021 · Land Degradation and Development

Soil moisture and nitrogen content influence wheat yield through their effects on the root system and soil bacterial diversity under drip irrigation

Guochun Li; Wenquan Niu; Jun Sun; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Soil properties and plants influence soil microbial community diversity, and their role in nutrient cycling could influence plant productivity; however, it is not clear the relationships between soil bacterial communities, soil moisture, and nitrogen (N) content, and whether these associations influence plant productivity. In this study, we investigated how the soil microbial community affects root zone productivity in winter wheat. We also verified whether productivity can be improved by water adjustment and N management in drip irrigation field experiments (I0, natural condition; I1, jointing to heading stage S1 55%–80%θ f , field capacity, anthesis to mature stage S2 70%–80%θ f ; I2, S1 55%–90%θ f , S2 70%–90%θ f ; and I3, S1 55%–100%θ f , S2 70%–100%θ f ) and under different N application rates (N0, N1, N2, and N3 represent 0, 150, 200, and 250 kg N ha −1 ). Soil moisture and N application rate significantly influenced water use efficiency (WUE), N use efficiency (NUE), yield, and soil bacterial abundance and diversity in the wheat root zone. N application decreased the richness indices in un‐irrigated soils (I0), whereas it initially increased, and then decreased the indices in irrigated soils (I1, I2, and I3). The primary factor influencing the dominant bacterial taxa was soil moisture content (SMC), followed by root length density (RLD). The root system and soil bacterial diversity strong influenced wheat yield. The I1N1 treatment resulted in the highest root weight density (RWD), WUE, and NUE, and thus increased wheat yield; furthermore, it had the least influence on the diversity of soil bacteria. Our work suggests that the response of bacterial communities to soil moisture and nitrogen content largely regulates crop production in agro‐ecosystems, and that regulating soil moisture and nitrogen fertilizer use may provide a sustainable solution for maintaining farmland productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture and nitrogen significantly influenced WUE and NUE.

Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE), N use efficiency (NUE)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture and N application rate significantly influenced water use efficiency (WUE), N use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture and nitrogen significantly influenced yield.

Outcome
yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture and N application rate significantly influenced water use efficiency (WUE), N use efficiency (NUE), yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture and nitrogen significantly influenced bacterial abundance and diversity.

Outcome
soil bacterial abundance and diversitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture and N application rate significantly influenced water use efficiency (WUE), N use efficiency (NUE), yield, and soil bacterial abundance and diversity in the wheat root zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen decreased bacterial richness without irrigation.

Outcome
richness indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application decreased the richness indices in un‐irrigated soils (I0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen first increased then decreased richness under irrigation.

Outcome
indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it initially increased, and then decreased the indices in irrigated soils (I1, I2, and I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture was the main driver of dominant bacterial taxa.

Outcome
dominant bacterial taxae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The primary factor influencing the dominant bacterial taxa was soil moisture content (SMC), followed by root length density (RLD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots and bacterial diversity influenced yield.

Outcome
wheat yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root system and soil bacterial diversity strong influenced wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I1N1 had the highest root weight density, WUE and NUE.

Outcome
root weight density (RWD), WUE, and NUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I1N1 treatment resulted in the highest root weight density (RWD), WUE, and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I1N1 increased wheat yield.

Outcome
wheat yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I1N1 treatment resulted in the highest root weight density (RWD), WUE, and NUE, and thus increased wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I1N1 had the least effect on bacterial diversity.

Outcome
diversity of soil bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had the least influence on the diversity of soil bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑