Paper · 2021 · PLANT ARCHIVES

INFLUENCE OF CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AND NPK NANOFERTILIZERS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CABBAGE PLANT

Mays F. Abdulhameed; Ali A. Taha; Raid A. Ismail

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This works has been carried out in the experimental field, Abu Ghraib region, Baghdad to investigate effect of use CeO 2 (100 mg/L), NPK nanofertilizers (30g, 48g, 100g) and NPK chemical fertilizers (840g, 420g, 840g).The most important results indicated that the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield. The highest total plant yield was in NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatment (72 ton/ha) followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment. Plants which fertilized with NPK, NPK+CeO 2 give high chlorophyll content compared to the plants that fertilized with NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilization exceeded chemical fertilization in plant height, head weight and external leaves weight.

Treatment
two types of nanofertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, head weight, external leaves weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
chemical fertilization treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“CABBAGE PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilization exceeded chemical fertilization in total plant yield.

Treatment
two types of nanofertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
total plant yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
chemical fertilization treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“CABBAGE PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus CeO2 nanoparticles produced the highest total yield, 72 ton/ha.

Treatment
NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatmente0
Outcome
total plant yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
72 ton/hae0
Qualifier
68.704 ton/hae0
Comparator
NPK nanofertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total plant yield was in NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatment (72 ton/ha) followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“CABBAGE PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK nanofertilizer produced 68.704 ton/ha total yield.

Treatment
NPK nanofertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
YIELDt0
Value
68.704 ton/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“INFLUENCE OF CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AND NPK NANOFERTILIZERS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CABBAGE PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and NPK plus CeO2 treatments gave higher chlorophyll content than chemical fertilizer and CeO2 treatments.

Treatment
NPK, NPK+CeO 2e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants which fertilized with NPK, NPK+CeO 2 give high chlorophyll content compared to the plants that fertilized with NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“CABBAGE PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.