Abstract
This works has been carried out in the experimental field, Abu Ghraib region, Baghdad to investigate effect of use CeO 2 (100 mg/L), NPK nanofertilizers (30g, 48g, 100g) and NPK chemical fertilizers (840g, 420g, 840g).The most important results indicated that the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield. The highest total plant yield was in NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatment (72 ton/ha) followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment. Plants which fertilized with NPK, NPK+CeO 2 give high chlorophyll content compared to the plants that fertilized with NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilization exceeded chemical fertilization in plant height, head weight and external leaves weight.
- Taxon
- CABBAGE PLANT
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- two types of nanofertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant height, head weight, external leaves weighte0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- chemical fertilization treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield”
t0“CABBAGE PLANT”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilization exceeded chemical fertilization in total plant yield.
- Taxon
- CABBAGE PLANT
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- two types of nanofertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- total plant yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- chemical fertilization treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the two types of nanofertilization treatments were superior to the chemical fertilization treatment in plant height, head weight, external leaves weight and total plant yield”
t0“CABBAGE PLANT”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK plus CeO2 nanoparticles produced the highest total yield, 72 ton/ha.
- Taxon
- CABBAGE PLANT
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatmente0
- Outcome
- total plant yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 72 ton/hae0
- Qualifier
- 68.704 ton/hae0
- Comparator
- NPK nanofertilizer treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest total plant yield was in NPK+ CeO 2 NPs treatment (72 ton/ha) followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment”
t0“CABBAGE PLANT”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK nanofertilizer produced 68.704 ton/ha total yield.
- Taxon
- CABBAGE PLANT
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- NPK nanofertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- YIELDt0
- Value
- 68.704 ton/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“followed (68.704 ton/ha) in NPK nanofertilizer treatment”
t0“INFLUENCE OF CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AND NPK NANOFERTILIZERS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CABBAGE PLANT”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK and NPK plus CeO2 treatments gave higher chlorophyll content than chemical fertilizer and CeO2 treatments.
- Taxon
- CABBAGE PLANT
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- NPK, NPK+CeO 2e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- highe0
- Comparator
- NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plants which fertilized with NPK, NPK+CeO 2 give high chlorophyll content compared to the plants that fertilized with NPK chemical fertilizers and CeO 2 NPs”
t0“CABBAGE PLANT”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
492 papers more in this group
See all 496 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.