Abstract
Do głównych patogenów pszenicy należy Fusarium spp. Grzyb ten przyczynia się do poważnych strat w plonie, jak również często stanowi przyczynę znacznego pogorszenia jakości materiału siewnego. W zapobieganiu chorobom fuzaryjnym najważniejszy jest zdrowy materiał siewny oraz właściwe zaprawianie – najskuteczniejsza i najłatwiejsza metoda ochrony roślin. Niestety w rolnictwie ekologicznym dobór odpowiednich substancji jest ograniczony przez zakaz stosowania zapraw chemicznych. Celem badań była ocena wybranych, dostępnych produktów handlowych zawierających konsorcjum mikroorganizmów oraz krzem. Wykorzystano ziarno pszenicy jarej, odmiany Arabella. Oceniono kiełkowanie ziarna, zdrowotność siewek oraz ich rozwój. Zastosowanie zaprawy Panoramix wpłynęło negatywnie na zdolność kiełkowania ziarna. Zarówno zaprawianie mikrobiologiczne, jak i krzemem zwiększyło wysokość źdźbła oraz ograniczyło porażenie roślin w porównaniu do niezaprawionej kontroli. Dla testowanych zapraw zgodnych z wymaganiami rolnictwa ekologicznego uzyskano wyniki porównywalne z zaprawą chemiczną. Fusarium spp. as one of the main pathogens of wheat contributes to yield loss and is carried with the plant material. To prevent Fusarium caused diseases, healthy seed material and proper seed treatment are essential. Unfortunately, in the organic farming the selection of appropriate substances is limited due to a ban on chemical seed treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the available commercial products containing a consortium of microorganisms and silicon. Spring wheat grain of the Arabella cultivar was used. The germination of grain, the health of seedlings and their development were assessed. Panoramix seed treatment had a negative effect on the germination capacity of the grain. Both the microbiological and silicon treatments increased the ear weight, the height of the stalk and reduced the infestation of the plants compared to the untreated control group. For the tested treatments, compliant with the requirements of organic farming, the obtained results were comparable to the chemical treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Panoramix seed treatment reduced grain germination capacity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Arabellae1
- Treatment
- Panoramix seed treatmente0
- Outcome
- germination capacitye0
- Direction
- negative effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Panoramix seed treatment had a negative effect on the germination capacity of the grain.”
t0“wheat seeds”
e1“Spring wheat grain of the Arabella cultivar was used.”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbiological treatment increased ear weight and stalk height versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- microbiologicale0
- Outcome
- ear weight, the height of the stalke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- untreated control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both the microbiological and silicon treatments increased the ear weight, the height of the stalk and reduced the infestation of the plants compared to the untreated control group.”
t0“wheat seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon treatment increased ear weight and stalk height versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- silicon treatmentse0
- Outcome
- ear weight, the height of the stalke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- untreated control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both the microbiological and silicon treatments increased the ear weight, the height of the stalk and reduced the infestation of the plants compared to the untreated control group.”
t0“wheat seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbiological treatment reduced plant infestation versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- microbiologicale0
- Outcome
- infestation of the plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated control groupe0
FusariumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both the microbiological and silicon treatments increased the ear weight, the height of the stalk and reduced the infestation of the plants compared to the untreated control group.”
t0“wheat seeds”
e1“Fusarium spp. as one of the main pathogens of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon treatment reduced plant infestation versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- silicon treatmentse0
- Outcome
- infestation of the plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both the microbiological and silicon treatments increased the ear weight, the height of the stalk and reduced the infestation of the plants compared to the untreated control group.”
t0“wheat seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic-compatible tested treatments gave results comparable to chemical treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tested treatmentse0
- Outcome
- obtained resultse0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- chemical treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the tested treatments, compliant with the requirements of organic farming, the obtained results were comparable to the chemical treatment.”
t0“wheat seeds”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 259 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.