Paper · 2021 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Potassium application for sugarcane in a sandy loam Oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado

Alvaro do Nascimento Rodrigues; Leandro Flávio Carneiro; Daniella Nogueira Moraes Carneiro; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate rates and methods of potassium application for plant cane (Saccharum spp.) grown in a dystrophic Typic Haplustox with a sandy loam texture in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was carried out in the municipality of Aporé, in the state of Goiás, using the RB92579 sugarcane variety. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks, with three replicates, in a 5x3 factorial arrangement, with five potassium rates (0, 60, 110, 160, and 200 kg ha-1 K2O as potassium chloride) and three application methods (100% at the bottom of the planting furrow and covered with soil, 100% side-dressed on the sugarcane rows 60 days after planting, and 50% in the planting furrow and 50% side-dressed). The amount of potassium in the stalks in the control treatment was greater than that of the potassium stock extractable by Mehlich-1 in the 0-60 cm soil layer. Stalk and sugar yields increase linearly with potassium rates, approximately 20% with 200 kg ha-1 K2O compared with the control treatment (without potassium). Potassium content in stalks also increases with potassium rates. There is no significant effect of the potassium application methods on stalk and sugar yields and on cane quality variables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control stalk potassium exceeded extractable soil potassium stock.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
stalkse0
Outcome
amount of potassium in the stalkse0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
potassium stock extractable by Mehlich-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of potassium in the stalks in the control treatment was greater than that of the potassium stock extractable by Mehlich-1 in the 0-60 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk yield increased linearly with potassium rate, about 20% at 200 kg ha-1 K2O versus control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
200 kg ha-1 K2Oe0
Outcome
Stalk and sugar yieldse0
Direction
increase linearlye0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
control treatment (without potassium)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Stalk and sugar yields increase linearly with potassium rates, approximately 20% with 200 kg ha-1 K2O compared with the control treatment (without potassium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield increased linearly with potassium rate, about 20% at 200 kg ha-1 K2O versus control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
200 kg ha-1 K2Oe0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
increase linearlye0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
control treatment (without potassium)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Stalk and sugar yields increase linearly with potassium rates, approximately 20% with 200 kg ha-1 K2O compared with the control treatment (without potassium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk potassium content increased with potassium rate.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
potassium ratese0
Outcome
Potassium content in stalkse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium content in stalks also increases with potassium rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application method did not significantly affect stalk or sugar yields or cane quality.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
potassium application methodse0
Outcome
stalk and sugar yields and on cane quality variablese0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There is no significant effect of the potassium application methods on stalk and sugar yields and on cane quality variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.