Paper · 2021 · The Atrium (University of Guelph)

Comparing plant growth regulators: Anuew, Primo Maxx and an experimental on a USGA putting green

E.M. Lyons; Corey Flude; John Watson; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Applying plant growth regulators to economically significant turf on golf courses to control height, reduce frequency of mowing operations, and enhance playing surface consistency is a common industry practice. This study compared Anuew (prohexadione-calcium), Primo Maxx (trinexapac-ethyl) and experimental NAI-20026 (trinexepac-ethyl) on turfgrass growth and quality parameters on a greens-height stand of creeping bentgrass. On many occasions throughout the experiment, PGR treatments significantly reduced turfgrass growth when compared to the untreated control and improved turfgrass quality and colour ratings. Anuew 5.6 had significantly higher NDVI readings than the untreated control on three occasions throughout the experiment. NufTE (experimental NAI-20026) performed similarly to Primo on both the 300 GDD and 4-week application schedules and often were ranked the same for many parameters throughout the experiment. No stress symptoms (yellowing, etiolation) were observed on the putting green turf in response to PGR application during hot/dry weather at any point during the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR treatments reduced turfgrass growth.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
PGR treatmentse0
Outcome
turfgrass growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGR treatments significantly reduced turfgrass growth when compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR treatments improved turf quality and colour ratings.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
PGR treatmentse0
Outcome
turfgrass quality and colour ratingse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGR treatments significantly reduced turfgrass growth when compared to the untreated control and improved turfgrass quality and colour ratings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–615 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anuew 5.6 had higher NDVI on three occasions.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
Anuew 5.6e0
Outcome
NDVI readingse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
on three occasions throughout the experimente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anuew 5.6 had significantly higher NDVI readings than the untreated control on three occasions throughout the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NufTE performed similarly to Primo across schedules.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
NufTE (experimental NAI-20026)e0
Outcome
performed similarlye0
Direction
similarlye0
Qualifier
on both the 300 GDD and 4-week application schedulese0
Comparator
Primoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NufTE (experimental NAI-20026) performed similarly to Primo on both the 300 GDD and 4-week application schedules and often were ranked the same for many parameters throughout the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–426 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No stress symptoms were observed following PGR application during hot dry weather.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
PGR applicatione0
Outcome
No stress symptoms (yellowing, etiolation)e0
Qualifier
during hot/dry weathere0
Setting
putting green turfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No stress symptoms (yellowing, etiolation) were observed on the putting green turf in response to PGR application during hot/dry weather at any point during the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–426 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · quality: postharvest · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.