Paper · 2021 · World Journal of Biology and Biotechnology

Effect of rhizobium isolates and nitrogen on nodulation, growth and yield in lentil

Muhammad Tarek; Rubaiyat Binte Billah; Saiyera Chowdhury

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Experiments were setup in three locations, Magura (23°3´ N 89°2´ E), Rangpur (25°7´ N 89°3´ E) and Mymensingh (24°8´ N 90°0´ E), Bangladesh to know the effect of two bacterial strains and 3 nitrogen doses on nodulation, yield and biomass production. The experimental material consists of one lentil popular variety viz., Binamasur-5 which was inoculated with two promising rhizobial starins/isolates namely LB-21 and LB-40 and three levels of nitrogen viz., 25, 50 and 75 kg N ha-1. The inoculant treatments were un-inoculated control (I0), LB-21 (I1), LB-40 (I2) and mixture of LB-21 and LB-40 (I1+I2). Results indicated that nodule number, nodule weight, straw yield and seed yield at the three locations were greater in bacterial isolates treated plants than in control plants. Results further indicated that mixture of two bacterial isolates had no superior effect against any single bacterial isolate. The two isolates (LB-21 and LB-40) had almost similar greater effect on nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yield with being the highest in LB-40. Application of 25 kg N ha-1 under both bacterial isolates performed the best in seed yield. Application of nitrogen at the rate of 75 kg ha-1 had adverse effect on nodulation, growth and seed yield in lentil. Therefore, for getting higher seed yield in lentil, should apply N as basal dose at the rate of 25 kg N ha-1 and the bacterial isolate, LB-40 may be registered as biofertilizer after few more trials in the different lentil growing areas of Bangladesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolates increased nodule number and nodule weight of lentil compared with uninoculated control plants.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
bacterial isolatese1
Interactor
bacterial isolatese1symbiont
Outcome
nodule number, nodule weighte1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
control plantse1
Setting
three locationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that nodule number, nodule weight, straw yield and seed yield at the three locations were greater in bacterial isolates treated plants than in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolates increased straw yield and seed yield of lentil compared with control plants.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
bacterial isolatese1
Interactor
bacterial isolatese1symbiont
Outcome
straw yield and seed yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
control plantse1
Setting
three locationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that nodule number, nodule weight, straw yield and seed yield at the three locations were greater in bacterial isolates treated plants than in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A mixture of two bacterial isolates had no superior effect over any single isolate.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
mixture of two bacterial isolatese2
Interactor
bacterial isolatese2symbiont
Outcome
effecte2
Direction
no superior effecte2
Comparator
any single bacterial isolatee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results further indicated that mixture of two bacterial isolates had no superior effect against any single bacterial isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate LB-40 had the highest effect on nodulation, physiological parameters and seed yield among the two isolates.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
LB-40e3
Interactor
LB-40e3symbiont
Outcome
nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
LB-21e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“The two isolates (LB-21 and LB-40) had almost similar greater effect on nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yield with being the highest in LB-40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LB-21 and LB-40 had almost similar greater effects on nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
LB-21 and LB-40e3
Interactor
LB-21 and LB-40e3symbiont
Outcome
nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yielde3
Direction
almost similar greatere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“The two isolates (LB-21 and LB-40) had almost similar greater effect on nodule number, nodule weight, physiological parameters and seed yield with being the highest in LB-40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 25 kg N ha-1 under both bacterial isolates gave the best seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
25 kg N ha-1e4
Interactor
bacterial isolatese4symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
performed the beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 25 kg N ha-1 under both bacterial isolates performed the best in seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 75 kg N ha-1 had an adverse effect on nodulation, growth and seed yield of lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
nitrogen at the rate of 75 kg ha-1e5
Outcome
nodulation, growth and seed yielde5
Direction
adverse effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of nitrogen at the rate of 75 kg ha-1 had adverse effect on nodulation, growth and seed yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1293 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil should receive 25 kg N ha-1 as a basal dose for higher seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
seed yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e6

“for getting higher seed yield in lentil, should apply N as basal dose at the rate of 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1403 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate LB-40 may be registered as a biofertilizer after more trials in Bangladesh.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Interactor
bacterial isolate, LB-40e7symbiont
Outcome
registered as biofertilizere7
Setting
lentil growing areas of Bangladeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nodulation, growth and yield in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“the bacterial isolate, LB-40 may be registered as biofertilizer after few more trials in the different lentil growing areas of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1545 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.