Abstract
A field experiment were conducted for two consecutive rabi seasons during 2017-18 and 2018-19 at Soil Conservation and Water Management farm, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology Kanpur- 200 802 on Gangatic alluvial soil having 7.6 pH, light textured soil with medium soil fertility. Treatments comprises of viz., 3- preparatory tillage 1) T1 - one cross ploughing with cultivator, 2) T2 - one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivator and 3) T3- one ploughing with disc harrow + one pass with rotavator, 3- nutrient management practices i.e. 1.) N1-100% RDF (60 Kg N ha-1 + 30 Kg P2O5 ha-1+ 30 Kg K2O ha-1) (through chemical fertilizer), 2.) N2-75% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) + 25% FYM (Farm yard manure) and 3.) N3-50% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) +50% FYM (Farm yard manure) and 3- moisture conservation practices viz., 1.) M1- Control, 2.) M2- dust mulch and 3.) M3--pinoxaden 5.1 EC @ 50 g ha-1 + VAM @ 15 Kg ha-1) was researches. It is clear from the results of two year experimentation that sowing of barley crop in plots where preparatory tillage, T3- one ploughing with disc harrow + one pass with rotavator, nutrient applied as N3-50% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) + 50% FYM (farm yard manure) and moisture conservation practices of M3-pinoxaden 5EC @ 50 g/ha. + VAM @ 15 Kg/ha brought out the maximum values of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, fresh and dry weight of barley observed during both the years of study respectively followed by T2- one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivator, N2 treatment- 75% RDF + 25% FYM and M2- dust mulch, and minimum values of treatments i.e., T1 - one cross ploughing with cultivator, N1-100% RDF (60 Kg N ha-1 + 30 Kg P2O5 ha-1+ 30 Kg K2O ha-1) (through chemical fertilizer) and moisture conservation practices of M1-control treatment in both year respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The T3 tillage practice produced maximum barley grain, straw, biological yield and fresh and dry weight, followed by T2 and then T1.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- T3- one ploughing with disc harrow + one pass with rotavatore0
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield, biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- T2- one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivatore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Barley Cultivation”
e0“T3- one ploughing with disc harrow + one pass with rotavator, nutrient applied as N3-50% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) + 50% FYM (farm yard manure) and moisture conservation practices of M3-pinoxaden 5EC @ 50 g/ha. + VAM @ 15 Kg/ha brought out the maximum values of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, fresh and dry weight of barley observed during both the years of study respectively followed by T2- one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivator, N2 treatment- 75% RDF + 25% FYM and M2- dust mulch, and minimum values of treatments i.e., T1 - one cross ploughing with cultivator”
Claim · model-written summary
N3 nutrient management gave maximum barley yields and fresh and dry weight, followed by N2 and then N1.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- N3-50% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) + 50% FYMe0
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield, biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- N2 treatment- 75% RDF + 25% FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient applied as N3-50% RDF (through chemical fertilizer) + 50% FYM (farm yard manure) and moisture conservation practices of M3-pinoxaden 5EC @ 50 g/ha. + VAM @ 15 Kg/ha brought out the maximum values of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, fresh and dry weight of barley observed during both the years of study respectively followed by T2- one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivator, N2 treatment- 75% RDF + 25% FYM and M2- dust mulch, and minimum values of treatments i.e., T1 - one cross ploughing with cultivator, N1-100% RDF”
Claim · model-written summary
M3 moisture conservation produced maximum barley yields and fresh and dry weight, followed by dust mulch and control.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- M3-pinoxaden 5EC @ 50 g/ha. + VAM @ 15 Kg/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield, biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- M2- dust mulche0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M3-pinoxaden 5EC @ 50 g/ha. + VAM @ 15 Kg/ha brought out the maximum values of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, fresh and dry weight of barley observed during both the years of study respectively followed by T2- one ploughing with disc harrow + one cross ploughing with cultivator, N2 treatment- 75% RDF + 25% FYM and M2- dust mulch, and minimum values of treatments i.e., T1 - one cross ploughing with cultivator, N1-100% RDF (60 Kg N ha-1 + 30 Kg P2O5 ha-1+ 30 Kg K2O ha-1) (through chemical fertilizer) and moisture conservation practices of M1-control treatment”
The same questions in other papers
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
mycorrhiza · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.