Paper · 2005 · mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich)

Quantification of water uptake of hyphae contributing to barley subjected to drought conditions

Mohammad Ali Khalvati

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To investigate the quantification of water uptake by extraradical hyphae and effect of root mycorrhization on water relations of host plants several experiments were carried out in this study. We evaluated the effects of colonization of barley (Hordeum vulgaris L. var. Scarlett) roots with two VAM fungi (Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae) on growth, yield components, leaf water relations and acquisition of nutrients under simulated drought or well-watered conditions in a greenhouse. We observed mild effects of the two mycorrhizal fungi on leaf water relation between VAM and non-VAM drought stressed plants but no specific effects on yield parameters or plant nutrients uptake. However, that drought conditions surprisingly increased root colonization by VAM. Though under drought condition, only G. intraradices changed the leaf area of plants slightly but statistically significant. We also noted some differences between G. intraradices and G. mosseae in their effect on nutrient uptake by barley under the same growth conditions. In the split-root-hyphae system experiments we subjected barley plants to simulated drought and studied the effects of symbiosis with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus intraradices) on water uptake and elongation of plant leaves. Ninety days after sowing, the initial gravimetric soil water content was reduced by about 2-4 % in the hyphae compartments of drought stressed plants with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAM plants) as compared to that in the plants without vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (non-VAM plants). In this study, leaf water potential was lower in VAM plants, relative leaf water content and leaf turgor pressure were all higher in VAM plants than in the non-VAM plants, but at the end of the drying cycles leaf 5 on the mainstem of drought stressed VAM plants was 33% longer than in the non-VAM plants. We suggest, however, that the improved leaf water relations, longer leaf, and faster leaf elongation rate in the drought stressed VAM plants compared with the non-VAM plants, might have been due to the impact of VAM on plants which were independent on the higher contribution of VAM hyphae to water uptake by drought stressed VAM plants. Effect of VAM on the transport of water to barley roots from a physically separate soil compartment (hyphae compartments) was measured by means of capacitance sensors in the last experiment. Results indicated a decrease in soil water content in the hyphae compartments of plants colonized by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhize (VAM) when compared to the corresponding values in the compartment of control treatment (non-VAM plants). This was taken as evidence for the uptake of water by the extraradical hyphae and its transfer to the host plants in the adjacent, but physically unattached, plant compartment (PC). Measurements showed that under drought condition, VAM hyphae transported 5-7% of the soil water from the hyphae compartments to the plant compartment as compared with non-VAM plants. The data also showed indications for a reverse mass transport of water from the plant compartment (when plants were periodically watered) to the hyphae compartment by the hyphae strands connecting the two compartments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two mycorrhizal fungi had mild effects on leaf water relations of drought-stressed barley compared with non-mycorrhizal plants.

Treatment
the two mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
leaf water relatione0
Comparator
non-VAM drought stressed plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“We observed mild effects of the two mycorrhizal fungi on leaf water relation between VAM and non-VAM drought stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two mycorrhizal fungi had no specific effects on yield parameters or plant nutrient uptake of drought-stressed barley.

Treatment
the two mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
yield parameters or plant nutrients uptakee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
non-VAM drought stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“We observed mild effects of the two mycorrhizal fungi on leaf water relation between VAM and non-VAM drought stressed plants but no specific effects on yield parameters or plant nutrients uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought conditions surprisingly increased root colonization by VAM fungi.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonization by VAMe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought conditions surprisingly increased root colonization by VAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, only G. intraradices changed leaf area of barley plants, slightly but statistically significantly.

Treatment
G. intraradicese0
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area of plantse0
Setting
drought conditione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Though under drought condition, only G. intraradices changed the leaf area of plants slightly but statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices and G. mosseae differed in their effect on nutrient uptake by barley under the same growth conditions.

Treatment
G. intraradicese0
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Second interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Comparator
G. mosseaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“We also noted some differences between G. intraradices and G. mosseae in their effect on nutrient uptake by barley under the same growth conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the hyphae compartments of drought-stressed plants with mycorrhizal fungi, initial gravimetric soil water content was reduced by about 2-4 % compared with plants without the fungi.

Treatment
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
initial gravimetric soil water contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2-4 %e0
Comparator
plants without vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (non-VAM plants)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the initial gravimetric soil water content was reduced by about 2-4 % in the hyphae compartments of drought stressed plants with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAM plants) as compared to that in the plants without vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (non-VAM plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potential was lower in VAM barley plants than in non-VAM plants.

Treatment
VAM plantse0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-VAM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf water potential was lower in VAM plants, relative leaf water content and leaf turgor pressure were all higher in VAM plants than in the non-VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative leaf water content and leaf turgor pressure were higher in VAM barley plants than in non-VAM plants.

Treatment
VAM plantse0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
relative leaf water content and leaf turgor pressuree0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-VAM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf water potential was lower in VAM plants, relative leaf water content and leaf turgor pressure were all higher in VAM plants than in the non-VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the end of the drying cycles, leaf 5 on the mainstem of drought-stressed VAM plants was 33% longer than in non-VAM plants.

Treatment
drought stressed VAM plantse0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf 5 on the mainsteme0
Direction
longere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
non-VAM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the end of the drying cycles leaf 5 on the mainstem of drought stressed VAM plants was 33% longer than in the non-VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the capacitance-sensor experiment, soil water content decreased in the hyphae compartments of plants colonized by VAM compared with control compartments.

Treatment
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhize (VAM)e0
Interactor
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizee0symbiont
Outcome
soil water content in the hyphae compartmentse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control treatment (non-VAM plants)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicated a decrease in soil water content in the hyphae compartments of plants colonized by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhize (VAM) when compared to the corresponding values in the compartment of control treatment (non-VAM plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2428–2665 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors took the decrease in hyphae-compartment soil water as evidence that extraradical hyphae take up water and transfer it to host plants in the adjacent, physically unattached plant compartment.

Outcome
uptake of water by the extraradical hyphaee0
Qualifier
its transfer to the host plants in the adjacent, but physically unattached, plant compartmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was taken as evidence for the uptake of water by the extraradical hyphae and its transfer to the host plants in the adjacent, but physically unattached, plant compartment (PC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2667–2847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, VAM hyphae transported 5-7% of the soil water from the hyphae compartments to the plant compartment compared with non-VAM plants.

Treatment
VAM hyphaee0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
soil watere0
Value
5-7%e0
Qualifier
from the hyphae compartments to the plant compartmente0
Comparator
non-VAM plantse0
Setting
drought conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought condition, VAM hyphae transported 5-7% of the soil water from the hyphae compartments to the plant compartment as compared with non-VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2874–3030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Data indicated a reverse mass transport of water from the plant compartment to the hyphae compartment through connecting hyphae strands when plants were periodically watered.

Outcome
reverse mass transport of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data also showed indications for a reverse mass transport of water from the plant compartment (when plants were periodically watered) to the hyphae compartment by the hyphae strands connecting the two compartments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3032–3249 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the improved leaf water relations, longer leaf and faster leaf elongation in drought-stressed VAM plants may be due to VAM effects on plants independent of the hyphal contribution to water uptake.

Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
improved leaf water relations, longer leaf, and faster leaf elongation ratee0
Qualifier
independent on the higher contribution of VAM hyphae to water uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the improved leaf water relations, longer leaf, and faster leaf elongation rate in the drought stressed VAM plants compared with the non-VAM plants, might have been due to the impact of VAM on plants which were independent on the higher contribution of VAM hyphae to water uptake by drought stressed VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2235 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.