Abstract
In order to evaluate the response of grain yield, yield compounds, quality and water use efficiency of barley cv. Giza 126 cultivar to irrigation water regimes and biofertilization inoculation, field experiment was conducted in the Experimental Farm of Maryout Experimental Station, Desert Research Center, Egypt, during two successive growing seasons 2017/18 and 2018/19. The experimental design was a split plot, whereas the main plots involved by irrigation water regimes and the sub-main plots involved by biofertilization treatments, with three replicates. The obtained results indicated that yield, yield attributes and N, P and K contents in grains of barley i.e. plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield ha-1. The contents of nitrogen, phosphorus percentage in barley grains and water use efficiency significantly increased with increasing irrigation water applications and by biofertilizers treatments. However, the number of spikelets/spike, and potassium percentage in grains was not significantly affected by irrigations water regimes and/or biofertilizers treatments. Water use efficiency (kg m-3) for grain yield significantly increased with increasing irrigation water application with biofertilizers treatments in the two growing seasons. The highest values of all studded traits were recorded by applying the three times irrigation in the two seasons. Regarding biofertilizers inoculation effects, results showed that the maximum values of most studied traits were recorded by inoculating with both Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter together as a combination treatment for both seasons except plant height, which produced highest values, by inoculating with Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter in the first season and by using Azotobacter alone in the second one. On the other side, maximum value of nitrogen percentage in grains were recorded by treating the plant with Azotobacter alone in the two seasons. The results clearly showed that barley plants which irrigated by the three irrigations and inoculated by Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter together, as a combination treatment, produced the highest yield, yield components and water use efficiency at the North Western Coast of Egypt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation water increased barley yield and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- increasing irrigation water applicationse1
- Outcome
- yield, yield attributese0
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield attributes and N, P and K contents in grains of barley i.e. plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield ha-1.”
e1“The contents of nitrogen, phosphorus percentage in barley grains and water use efficiency significantly increased with increasing irrigation water applications and by biofertilizers treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer treatments increased barley grain nitrogen and phosphorus percentages and water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- nitrogen, phosphorus percentage in barley grains and water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The contents of nitrogen, phosphorus percentage in barley grains and water use efficiency significantly increased with increasing irrigation water applications and by biofertilizers treatments.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Spikelets per spike and grain potassium percentage were not significantly affected by irrigation or biofertilizers.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- irrigations water regimes and/or biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- number of spikelets/spike, and potassium percentage in grainse0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the number of spikelets/spike, and potassium percentage in grains was not significantly affected by irrigations water regimes and/or biofertilizers treatments.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain water use efficiency increased with greater irrigation combined with biofertilizers across both seasons.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation water application with biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Water use efficiency (kg m-3) for grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the two growing seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water use efficiency (kg m-3) for grain yield significantly increased with increasing irrigation water application with biofertilizers treatments in the two growing seasons.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations produced the highest values of the studied traits in both seasons.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- the three times irrigatione0
- Outcome
- all studded traitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- in the two seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest values of all studded traits were recorded by applying the three times irrigation in the two seasons.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter inoculation gave maximum values of most traits in both seasons.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- inoculating with both Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter togethere0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- most studied traitse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum values of most studied traits were recorded by inoculating with both Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter together as a combination treatment for both seasons”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter gave greatest plant height in the first season.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- inoculating with Mycorrhiza and Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- in the first seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, which produced highest values, by inoculating with Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter in the first season”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter alone gave greatest plant height in the second season.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- using Azotobacter alonee0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- in the second onee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, which produced highest values, by inoculating with Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter in the first season and by using Azotobacter alone in the second one.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter alone gave maximum grain nitrogen percentage in both seasons.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- treating the plant with Azotobacter alonee0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen percentage in grainse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum value of nitrogen percentage in grains were recorded by treating the plant with Azotobacter alone in the two seasons.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations combined with both inoculants gave highest barley yield, yield components and water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- the three irrigations and inoculated by Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter togethere0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- yield, yield components and water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Setting
- North Western Coast of Egypte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“barley plants which irrigated by the three irrigations and inoculated by Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter together, as a combination treatment, produced the highest yield, yield components and water use efficiency at the North Western Coast of Egypt.”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azotobacter · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →inoculation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →inoculation · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →soil water · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.