Paper · 2021 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Soil Sampling Spacing Based on Precision Agriculture Variable Rate Fertilization of Pomegranate Orchard

Weihua Wang; Liliang Cai; Peiyu Peng; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Variable rate fertilization is one of the core technologies of precision agriculture, and it is particularly important to develop a representative field sampling scheme with less workload. A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town, Jianshui County, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, and set up 7 groups of sample point deletion schemes to study the reasonable sampling spacing of soil nutrients. Based on the grading standard of soil nutrients in plow layer, the distribution of soil nutrients was statistically analyzed by using classical statistical methods to reveal the spatial distribution variability of soil nutrients. We then utilized a geostatistical method to interpolate the soil nutrient to obtain the soil nutrient distribution map, and compared the soil nutrient distribution map of the deletion sampling scheme with the original sampling scheme A in shape and area. Results revealed that the deletion scheme E was the most consistent with the sampling results of the full coverage sampling scheme A, and the number of soil sampling could be reduced by half under the premise of meeting the requirements of precise fertilization. The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization, the total yield of soft seed pomegranate increased by 41.52%, and the sugar content, sugar–acid ratio and vitamin C content of pomegranate grain increased by 11.79%, 51.26% and 31.59%. The results also provide support to determine sampling spacing, spatial variability of soil nutrients and variable rate fertilization in precision farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion sampling scheme E was the most consistent with the full coverage sampling scheme A in soil nutrient distribution.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
most consistent with the sampling resultse2
Comparator
full coverage sampling scheme Ae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results revealed that the deletion scheme E was the most consistent with the sampling results of the full coverage sampling scheme A, and the number of soil sampling could be reduced by half under the premise of meeting the requirements of precise fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1220 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of soil samples could be reduced by half while meeting precise fertilization requirements.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
number of soil samplinge2
Value
reduced by halfe2
Qualifier
under the premise of meeting the requirements of precise fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results revealed that the deletion scheme E was the most consistent with the sampling results of the full coverage sampling scheme A, and the number of soil sampling could be reduced by half under the premise of meeting the requirements of precise fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization saved 26% of nitrogen fertilizer compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
nitrogene3
Direction
savee3
Value
26%e3
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization saved 54% of phosphorus fertilizer compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
phosphoruse3
Direction
savee3
Value
54%e3
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization saved 34% of potassium fertilizer compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
potassiume3
Direction
savee3
Value
34%e3
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization increased total soft seed pomegranate yield by 41.52% compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
total yield of soft seed pomegranatee4
Direction
increasede4
Value
41.52%e4
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
e4

“the total yield of soft seed pomegranate increased by 41.52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization increased the sugar content of pomegranate grain by 11.79% compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
sugar contente5
Direction
increasede5
Value
11.79%e5
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
e5

“the sugar content, sugar–acid ratio and vitamin C content of pomegranate grain increased by 11.79%, 51.26% and 31.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization increased the sugar–acid ratio of pomegranate grain by 51.26% compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
sugar–acid ratioe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
51.26%e5
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
e5

“the sugar content, sugar–acid ratio and vitamin C content of pomegranate grain increased by 11.79%, 51.26% and 31.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization increased the vitamin C content of pomegranate grain by 31.59% compared with conventional farmer fertilization.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
variable rate fertilizatione3
Outcome
vitamin C contente5
Direction
increasede5
Value
31.59%e5
Comparator
farmers’ conventional fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A grid sampling of 1 m × 1 m was conducted on a pomegranate garden of 414 m2 in Nanzhuang Town”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiment showed that the variable rate fertilization could save 26%, 54% and 34% nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer compared with the farmers’ conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1414 · show in text ↑
e5

“the sugar content, sugar–acid ratio and vitamin C content of pomegranate grain increased by 11.79%, 51.26% and 31.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1599 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.