Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Long term Reduced Tillage Improved Soil Physical Characteristics and Crop Productivity in Subtropical Dryland of Pakistan

Sana ur Rehman; Shahzada Sohail Ijaz; Khalid Saifullah Khan; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recently there is a worldwide emphasis to shift intensive tillage to conservation tillage to control soil degradation.The objectives of this study were to evaluate long-term effects of conservation tillage on soil characteristics and prospects of cropping intensification in a subtropical dryland.This two-year field study was carried out in the plots of an established longterm field experiment (initiated in 2011) where four tillage systems were compared viz., conventional tillage (CT, moldboard), minimum tillage (MT), reduced tillage (RT) and zero tillage (ZT).Each tillage plot was split into three subplots for crop sequences viz., fallow-wheat (Triticum aestivum) (F-W), mung bean (Vigna radiata) green manure-wheat (M-W) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) fodder-wheat (S-W).Under all crop sequences soil profile water content (0-90 cm) was the highest in RT tillage plots (19%) and the lowest in ZT plots (13%).Both RT and ZT significantly increased water stable aggregates in soil (35%) compared with CT (22%).However, ZT had the highest bulk density that was on average 1.53 Mg ha -1 compared to 1.45 Mg ha -1 under CT.In summer, RT tillage produced higher biomass yield of sorghum and mung bean than other tillage systems.In winter, RT produced the highest wheat grain yield, which was 2.89 and 2.84 t ha -1 in 2016, and 2.63 and 2.61 t ha -1 in 2017 especially in F-W and M-W systems, respectively.Moreover, DSSAT model also confirmed increase in biomass and grain yields of wheat with long-term application of RT practices.In conclusion, reduced tillage strategy should be implemented to avoid soil deterioration and enhance crop productivity in subtropical drylands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil profile water content (0-90 cm) was highest in reduced tillage plots, 19%, compared with zero tillage.

Treatment
RT tillage plotse0
Outcome
soil profile water contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
ZT plotse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil profile water content (0-90 cm) was the highest in RT tillage plots (19%) and the lowest in ZT plots (13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil profile water content was lowest in zero tillage plots, 13%.

Treatment
ZT plotse0
Outcome
soil profile water contente0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil profile water content (0-90 cm) was the highest in RT tillage plots (19%) and the lowest in ZT plots (13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both reduced and zero tillage significantly increased water stable aggregates in soil (35%) compared with conventional tillage (22%).

Treatment
Both RT and ZTe0
Outcome
water stable aggregatese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35%e0
Qualifier
22%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Both RT and ZT significantly increased water stable aggregates in soil (35%) compared with CT (22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest bulk density, on average 1.53 Mg ha-1 versus 1.45 under conventional tillage.

Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.53 Mg ha -1e0
Qualifier
1.45 Mg ha -1e0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“ZT had the highest bulk density that was on average 1.53 Mg ha -1 compared to 1.45 Mg ha -1 under CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer, reduced tillage produced higher sorghum biomass yield than other tillage systems.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
RT tillagee0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summer, RT tillage produced higher biomass yield of sorghum and mung bean than other tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer, reduced tillage produced higher mung bean biomass yield than other tillage systems.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
RT tillagee0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summer, RT tillage produced higher biomass yield of sorghum and mung bean than other tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, reduced tillage gave the highest wheat grain yield, 2.89 t/ha in 2016 in the fallow-wheat system.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.89e0
Qualifier
F-We0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RT produced the highest wheat grain yield, which was 2.89 and 2.84 t ha -1 in 2016, and 2.63 and 2.61 t ha -1 in 2017 especially in F-W and M-W systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, reduced tillage gave the highest wheat grain yield, 2.84 t/ha in 2016 in the mung bean green manure-wheat system.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.84 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
M-We0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RT produced the highest wheat grain yield, which was 2.89 and 2.84 t ha -1 in 2016, and 2.63 and 2.61 t ha -1 in 2017 especially in F-W and M-W systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, reduced tillage gave the highest wheat grain yield, 2.63 t/ha in 2017 in the fallow-wheat system.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.63e0
Qualifier
F-We0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RT produced the highest wheat grain yield, which was 2.89 and 2.84 t ha -1 in 2016, and 2.63 and 2.61 t ha -1 in 2017 especially in F-W and M-W systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, reduced tillage gave the highest wheat grain yield, 2.61 t/ha in 2017 in the mung bean green manure-wheat system.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.61 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
M-We0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RT produced the highest wheat grain yield, which was 2.89 and 2.84 t ha -1 in 2016, and 2.63 and 2.61 t ha -1 in 2017 especially in F-W and M-W systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The DSSAT model simulated increased wheat biomass and grain yields with long-term application of reduced tillage.

Treatment
long-term application of RT practicese0
Outcome
biomass and grain yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSSAT model also confirmed increase in biomass and grain yields of wheat with long-term application of RT practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1532 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend implementing reduced tillage in subtropical drylands to avoid soil deterioration and raise crop productivity.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
reduced tillage strategy should be implementede0

Verbatim

e0

“reduced tillage strategy should be implemented to avoid soil deterioration and enhance crop productivity in subtropical drylands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1676 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.