Paper · 2021 · Pure and Applied Biology

Boron application influenced growth, yield and fiber quality of upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.) under different irrigation regimes

Ayaz Ahmad

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is a major imperative cash crop crop globally including Pakistan. Among abiotic stresses, drought stress is critical that suppress plant growth, reduce crop production, low fiber quality and poor earnings for farmers. Nutrient deficiency is major factor resulting in poor crop production. Sufficient nutrient application has better capability to increase yield because it helps to plants to stand against adverse climatic conditions within the growing areas. Therefore, present study was conducted on evaluation of cultivars performance applying numerous irrigation systems and use of boron through different methods. Cultivar CIM-678 had maximum growth traits, allometry parameters and fiber quality attributes than CIM-602 which had minimum growth, allometry and fiber quality traits. Foliar application of boron and field capacity (75%) also increased plant growth, allometry and fiber traits. The interactive effects of cultivars, boron use and field capacity were improved the plant growth, yield, allometry parameter and fiber quality traits. Conclusively, CIM-678, boron foliar spray and field capacity (75%) improved the cotton crop production with excellent fiber quality traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIM-678 had greater growth traits and allometry than CIM-602.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Material
CIM-678e0
Outcome
growth traits, allometry parameterse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
CIM-602e0

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar CIM-678 had maximum growth traits, allometry parameters and fiber quality attributes than CIM-602 which had minimum growth, allometry and fiber quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–792 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIM-678 had greater fiber quality attributes than CIM-602.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Material
CIM-678e0
Outcome
fiber quality attributese0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
CIM-602e0

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar CIM-678 had maximum growth traits, allometry parameters and fiber quality attributes than CIM-602 which had minimum growth, allometry and fiber quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron application increased plant growth and allometry.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
Foliar application of borone0
Outcome
plant growth, allometrye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of boron and field capacity (75%) also increased plant growth, allometry and fiber traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron application increased fiber traits.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
Foliar application of borone0
Outcome
fiber traitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of boron and field capacity (75%) also increased plant growth, allometry and fiber traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field capacity of 75% increased plant growth and allometry.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
field capacity (75%)e0
Outcome
plant growth, allometrye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of boron and field capacity (75%) also increased plant growth, allometry and fiber traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field capacity of 75% increased fiber traits.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
field capacity (75%)e0
Outcome
fiber traitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of boron and field capacity (75%) also increased plant growth, allometry and fiber traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar, boron, and field capacity interaction improved growth and allometry.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
cultivars, boron use and field capacitye0
Outcome
plant growth, yield, allometry parametere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“interactive effects of cultivars, boron use and field capacity were improved the plant growth, yield, allometry parameter and fiber quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar, boron, and field capacity interaction improved fiber quality.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
cultivars, boron use and field capacitye0
Outcome
fiber quality traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“upland cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“interactive effects of cultivars, boron use and field capacity were improved the plant growth, yield, allometry parameter and fiber quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1054 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

boron atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.