Paper · 1971 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Studies on the flowering of marigold

Yotaro TSUKAMOTO; Hideo IMANISHI; Hiroko YAHARA

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. French marigold, cultivar Butter Ball produced no flowers under long day (continuous illumination or 18 hours) conditions at 30°C, but did produce a high percentage of flowering under short day (10h) conditions at the same temperature. However, there was a slight difference in the flowering percentages between the long day and the short day lots at 20°C. Combinations of day length and temperature caused no marked differences in flowering of African marigold.2. Under conditions where the light intensity was reduced to below about 50% of full sun light, anthesis did not occur in the long day (16h) lot, while normal flowers developed in the short day (10h) lot. Natually, the more the light was reduced the fewer flowers were produced.3. Gibberellic acid slightly enhanced flowering of French marigold, while TIBA had no influence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French marigold Butter Ball did not flower under long days at 30°C but flowered frequently under short days.

Taxon
French marigoldTagetes patulae0
Material
Butter Balle0
Treatment
short day (10h) conditionse0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
high percentagee0
Comparator
long day (continuous illumination or 18 hours) conditionse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes patula
Tagetes patula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTomekgg08 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French marigold, cultivar Butter Ball produced no flowers under long day (continuous illumination or 18 hours) conditions at 30°C, but did produce a high percentage of flowering under short day (10h) conditions at the same temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering percentages differed only slightly between day lengths at 20°C.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
flowering percentagese0
Qualifier
at 20°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“there was a slight difference in the flowering percentages between the long day and the short day lots at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Day length and temperature combinations produced no marked flowering differences in African marigold.

Taxon
African marigoldTagetes erectae0
Treatment
Combinations of day length and temperaturee0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
no marked differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combinations of day length and temperature caused no marked differences in flowering of African marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At light below about half of full sunlight, anthesis failed under long days while normal flowers developed under short days.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
short day (10h)e0
Outcome
normal flowers developede0
Qualifier
below about 50% of full sun lighte0
Comparator
long day (16h)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the light intensity was reduced to below about 50% of full sun light, anthesis did not occur in the long day (16h) lot, while normal flowers developed in the short day (10h) lot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater light reduction produced fewer flowers.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
light was reducede0
Outcome
flowers were producede0
Direction
fewere0

Verbatim

e0

“the more the light was reduced the fewer flowers were produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid slightly enhanced French marigold flowering.

Taxon
French marigoldTagetes patulae0
Treatment
Gibberellic acide0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes patula
Tagetes patula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTomekgg08 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellic acid slightly enhanced flowering of French marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA had no influence on French marigold flowering.

Taxon
French marigoldTagetes patulae0
Treatment
TIBAe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes patula
Tagetes patula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTomekgg08 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellic acid slightly enhanced flowering of French marigold, while TIBA had no influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–838 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Tagetes patula (French marigold)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · phenology · Tagetes patula (French marigold)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

light · phenology · Tagetes erecta (African marigold)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · phenology · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.