Paper · 2021

Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisum sativum

Amir Khan; Fouzia Ishaq

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The importance of composts as a source of humus and nutrients to increase the fertility of soil and growth of plant has been well recognized in the present study. Different composts (Vermicompost and Pitcompost) and Garden soil (Control) were taken first for chemical analysis and then to find the effect of these composts on the growth of a vegetative crop ‘Pisum sativum’. It was found that the vermicompost was rich in nutrients like Potassium, Nitrate, Sodium, Calcium, Magnesium, and Chloride and have the potential for improving plant growth than pit compost and garden soil (control). The optimal plant growth in our study conducted for a period of one month was found in pots containing vermicompost. The study also showed distinct differences between vermicompost, pitcompost and garden soil (control) in terms of their nutrient content and their effect on plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost contained more listed nutrients than pit compost and garden soil.

Outcome
nutrients like Potassium, Nitrate, Sodium, Calcium, Magnesium, and Chloridee0
Direction
riche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the vermicompost was rich in nutrients like Potassium, Nitrate, Sodium, Calcium, Magnesium, and Chloride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea growth was optimal in pots containing vermicompost over one month.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
optimale0
Qualifier
a period of one monthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal plant growth in our study conducted for a period of one month was found in pots containing vermicompost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, pitcompost and garden soil differed in nutrient content.

Outcome
nutrient contente0
Direction
distinct differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“distinct differences between vermicompost, pitcompost and garden soil (control) in terms of their nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, pitcompost and garden soil differed in their effects on pea growth.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
distinct differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“distinct differences between vermicompost, pitcompost and garden soil (control) in terms of their nutrient content and their effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.