Paper · 2021

Evaluation of water deficite stress and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria effect on some of morphological traits and expression level of TDC and STR at the root of Catharanthus roseus

Maryam Ahmadzadeh; A. H. Keshtkar; Kobra Moslemkhany; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Catharanthus roseus is one of the most extensively investigated medicinal plants. Increase the concentrations of TIAs in plant organs, by biotic and abiotic treatments, is an important breeding objective on C. roseus. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Azospirillum brasilense separately and in combination along with moisture treatment at two levels were tested in Catharanthus roseus as a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design in three replications. Effect of treatments was evaluated 30 days after applying moisture treatments on some of morphological traits and Tdc and Str genes expression at the root of plant using qRT-PCR reaction. Water deficit significantly increased root length but it had no significant effect on the expression of these genes. Treatment with A. brasilense in normal condition enhanced length, volume and surface of roots, also significantly increased Str key gene expression. P. fluorescens had a positive and significant effect on the expression of the studied genes under normal and stress conditions compared to the control plants, despite the decrease in the amount of morphological traits. P. fluorescens and A. brasilense, separately, performed better in terms of their effects on the expression of the studied genes and increased the gene expression in normal and stress conditions compared to control plants. It is expected that by increasing the expression of Tdc and Str genes, the product of these genes as well as the final products of TIAs biosynthetic pathway, including ajmalicin content enhance at the root of periwinkle plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly increased root length.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit significantly increased root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit did not significantly change Tdc and Str expression.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Water deficite1
Gene
Tdc and Str genese2
Outcome
expression of these genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had no significant effect on the expression of these genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit significantly increased root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–759 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tdc and Str genes expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. brasilense enhanced root length, volume and surface under normal conditions.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Treatment with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
length, volume and surface of rootse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with A. brasilense in normal condition enhanced length, volume and surface of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. brasilense increased Str expression under normal conditions.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Treatment with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Gene
Stre0
Outcome
Str key gene expressione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with A. brasilense in normal condition enhanced length, volume and surface of roots, also significantly increased Str key gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens significantly increased studied gene expression under normal and stress conditions.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
P. fluorescense0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Gene
Tdc and Str genese1
Outcome
expression of the studied genese0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescens had a positive and significant effect on the expression of the studied genes under normal and stress conditions compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tdc and Str genes expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens decreased root morphological traits.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
P. fluorescense1
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
Outcome
morphological traitse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite the decrease in the amount of morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. fluorescens had a positive and significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. brasilense increased studied gene expression under normal and stress conditions compared with controls.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescens and A. brasilense, separately, performed better in terms of their effects on the expression of the studied genes and increased the gene expression in normal and stress conditions compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–186 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: expression · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · growth · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.