Paper · 2007 · Comptes Rendus Biologies

Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress

Cheruth Abdul Jaleel; Ragupathi Gopi; Beemarao Sankar; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
226
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two varieties, rosea and alba, of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. were screened for their water use efficiency under two watering regimes, viz. 60 and 100% filed capacity in the present study. Drought stress was imposed at 60% filed capacity from 30 to 70 days after sowing, while the control pots were maintained at 100% filed capacity throughout the entire growth period. Leaf area duration, cumulative water transpired, water use efficiency, net assimilation rate, mean transpiration rate, harvest index, biomass and yield under the water deficit level were measured from both stressed and well-watered control plants. Water use efficiency significantly increased in both varieties under water stress. Drought stress decreased leaf area duration, cumulative water transpired, net assimilation rate, mean transpiration rate, harvest index, and biomass yield in both varieties studied. Among the varieties, rosea variety showed the best results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency rose significantly under water stress in both varieties.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseuse1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency significantly increased in both varieties under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf area duration and cumulative transpiration.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseuse1
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf area duration, cumulative water transpirede0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress decreased leaf area duration, cumulative water transpired, net assimilation rate, mean transpiration rate, harvest index, and biomass yield in both varieties studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased net assimilation and mean transpiration rates.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseuse1
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
net assimilation rate, mean transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress decreased leaf area duration, cumulative water transpired, net assimilation rate, mean transpiration rate, harvest index, and biomass yield in both varieties studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased harvest index and biomass yield.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseuse1
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
harvest index, and biomass yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress decreased leaf area duration, cumulative water transpired, net assimilation rate, mean transpiration rate, harvest index, and biomass yield in both varieties studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rosea variety showed the best results among varieties.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseusCatharanthus roseuse1
Material
rosea varietye0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the varieties, rosea variety showed the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–66 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · yield · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.