Paper · CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka)

Laboratory and field germination of winter wheat and spring barley depending on the mode of irradiation with MWF of EHF and pre-sowing seed treatment

V.V. Bezpalko; S.V. Stankevych; L.V. Zhukova; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The pre-sowing seed treatment with chemical synthesis pesticides remains the primary method in the agricultural industry today. However, pesticides inevitably have a negative influence on the ecosystem of any level. A more environmentally friendly method of seed treatment under the intensive technology is the combination of microwave seed irradiation and seed incrustation with plant growth regulators that provide an increase in the cereal crops' yield capacity up to 15–20 %. As a result of research, it is established that when the seeds were treated with MWF of EHF the average laboratory indices of the sprouting energy and germinating power were slightly lower than in the case with Vitavax FF, 2.5 L/t. After treating the seeds irradiated with MWF of EHF with the plant growth regulator Mars EL, in 2010–2012, the average sprouting energy and germinating power of winter wheat seeds were higher by 2%, which corresponds to the indices of Vitavax 200 FF case. In the laboratory conditions, the sowing qualities of spring barley seeds varied depending on the method of the pre-sowing treatment and its variety. It can be concluded that the combination of the pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the plant growth regulators, in general, has a positive influence on the sowing qualities of winter wheat and spring barley. The combination of the pre-sowing irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the growth regulators positively influenced the field germination of winter wheat and spring barley seeds. Winter wheat of the Astet variety was sown at a sowing rate of 4,5 million viable seeds per 1 ha. The determination of field germination was performed in the phase of full sprouting. At the same time, it was found out that in 2010–2012 the average field germination under control and in the case with the Vitavax 200 FF treating agent was practically the same and amounted to 90,0–90,2 %. However, under the unfavorable conditions of 2012, the field germination of winter wheat seeds in the Vitavax 200 FF case exceeded the control by 7,8 %. The pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF in the modes of 1,8 kW/kg, 15 sec. and 0,9 kW/kg, 45 sec. increased the field germination of winter wheat by 6.9 and 7.4 %, respectively. In the cases where the seeds were treated with MWF of EHF and Mars EL preparation, it was higher by 9.1–11.8 %. This indicates that under unfavorable conditions, the pre-sowing seed treatment on field germination is more significant. Key words: disinfection, fungicides, growth regulators, pathogens, seeds, grain, winter wheat, spring barley, microwaves References Adamenko, T.I. (2008). Perspektivy ukrainskogo zernovogo rynka v kontekste globalnogo potepleniya. Hranenie i pererabotka zerna, 6 (108), 28–32 (in Russian). Anishin, L. (2002). Regulyatori rostu roslin: sumnivi i fakti. Propoziciya, 5, 64–65. (in Ukrainian). Babich, A.O., Himich, V.V. & Poberezhna, A.A. (1994). Svitove virobnictvo zerna prodovolchih i furazhnih kultur. Kormi i kormovij bilok: materiali pershoyi vseukrayinskoyi mizhnarodnoyi konferenciyi (16–17.11), Vinnicya, 74–75 (in Ukrainian). Belyaev V.I., Meinel, T., Grunevald, K., Sokolova, L.V., Kuznetsov, V.N., Matsyura, A.V. (2018). Influence of spring soft wheat, peas and rape cultivation technology on soil water regime and crop yield. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(1). 873-879. DOI: 10.15421/2018_287 Bezpalko, V.V. & Zhukova, L.V. (2019). Vikoristannya MP NVCh v tehnologiyi viroshuvannya yachmenyu yarogo. Visnik HNAU. Seriya “Fitopatologiya ta entomologiya”, 15–23 (in Ukrainian). Bezpal'ko, V.V., Stankevych, S.V., Zhukova, L.V., Matsyura, A.V., Zabrodina, I.V., Turenko, V.P., Horyainova, V.V., Poedinceva, ?.A., Zayarna, O.Yu., Lazarieva, O.V., Tsekhmeistruk, M.H., Pankova, O.V., Chygryna, S.A., Ogurtsov, Yu.Ye., Klymenko, I.I. (2021). Pre-sowing treatment of winter wheat and spring barley seeds with the extremely high frequencies electromagnetic field. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 11 (1), 62-71. Bezpal'ko, V.V., Stankevych, S.V., Zhukova, L.V., Zabrodina, I.V., Turenko, V.P., Horyainova, V.V., Poedinceva, ?.A., Batova, O.M., Zayarna, O.Yu., Bondarenko, S.V., Dolya, M.M., Mamchur, R.M., Drozd, P.Yu., Sakhnenko, V.V., Matsyura, A.V. (2020). Pre-sowing seed treatment in winter wheat and spring barley cultivation. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(6), 255-268. Bezpal'ko, V.V., Zhukova, L.V., Stankevych, S.V. & Zabrodina I.V. (2020). Ways to increase the yield capacity of winter wheat and spring barley on the basis of applying pre-sowing seed irradiation with extra high frequencies microwave field in the conditions of eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine: monograph. Kharkiv, Publishing House I. Ivanchenko. Bezpal'ko, V.V., Zhukova, L.V., Stankevych, S.V., Ogurtsov, Yu.H., Klymenko, I.I., Hutians'kyi, R.A., Fesenko, A.M., Turenko, V.P., Zabrodina, I.V., Bondarenko, S.V., Batova, O.M., Golovan, L.V., Klymenko, I.V., Poedinceva, A.A., Melenti, V.O. (2019). Ecologically safe methods for presowing treatment of cereal seeds. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(3), 189–197. Cherenkov, A.V. et al. (2010). Tehnologiyi viroshuvannya ozimoyi pshenici v zv’yazku z zminami pogodnih umov u Stepu Ukrayini / M. M. Solodushko, S. S. Yaroshenko, O. I. Zhelyazkov. Hranenie i pererabotka zerna, 6(132), 36–38 (in Ukrainian). Gentosh, D.T., Kyryk, M.M., Gentosh, I.D., Pikovskyi, MY., Polozhenets, V.M., Stankevych, S.V., Nemerytska, L.V., Zhuravska, I.A., Zabrodina, I.V., Zhukova, L.V. (2020). Species compositions of root rot agents of spring barley. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10 (3), 106–109. Horiainova, V.V., Turenko, V.P., Bilyk, M.O., Stankevych, S.V., Zhukova, L.V., Batova, O.M., Martynenko, V.I., Kucherenko, Ye.Yu., Zviahintseva, A.M. (2020). Species composition, morphological and biological peculiarities of leaf pathogens of spring wheat. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(3), 115–120. Krenke, A.N., Demyanchuk, V.V. & Emelyanova, Zh.L. (1992). Obespechennost territorii Ukrainy agroklimaticheskimi usloviyami dlya vozdelyvaniya ozimoj pshenicy. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki, 8, 27–31 (in Russian). Kuperman F. M. (1984). Morfofiziologiya rastenij: ucheb. posobie. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 240 (in Russian). Lichhochvor, V.V. & Petrichenko, V.F. et al. (2010). Roslinnictvo. Tehnologiyi viroshuvannya silskogospodarskih kultur. Lviv, NVF Ukrayinski tehnologiyi, 1088 (in Ukrainian). Lihochvor, V.V. & Petrichenko, V.F. (2006). Suchasni intensivni tehnologiyi viroshuvannya osnovnih polovih kultur. Roslinnictvo. Lviv, NVF “Ukrayinski tehnologiyi” (in Ukrainian). Lihochvor, V.V., Proc, R.R. & Dolezha, L.Ya. (2003). Yachmin. Lviv: NVF “Ukrayinski tehnologiyi” (in Ukrainian). Lyhochvor, V. (2003). Zastosuvannya regulyatoriv rostu roslin (morfo regulyatoriv, retardantiv) na posivah zernovih kultur. Propoziciya, 3-4, 56–57. (in Ukrainian). Nasinnya silskogospodarskih kultur sortovi ta posivni yakosti (1994). Tehnichni umovi. DSTU 2240–93. Kiyiv, Derzhstandart, 73 (in Ukrainian). Rozhkova, T.O., Burdulanyuk, A.O., Bakumenko, O.M., Yemets, O.M., Vlasenko, V.A., Tatarynova, V.I., Demenko, V.M., Osmachko, O.M., Polozhenets, V.M., Nemerytska, L.V., Zhuravska, I.A., Matsyura, A.V., Stankevych, S.V. (2021). Influence of seed treatment on microbiota and development of winter wheat seedlings. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 11 (1), 55-61. Sajko, V.F. (1997). Perspektiva virobnictva zerna v Ukrayini. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki, 9, 27–32 (in Ukrainian). Sajko, V.F. (2008). Naukovi osnovi zemlerobstva v konteksti zmin klimatu. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki, 11, 5–10. (in Ukrainian). Sajko, V.F., Gricaj, A.D. & Gordecka, S.P. (1994). Ozimi zernovi kulturi. Naukovi osnovi vedennya zernovogo gospodarstva, Kiyiv, Urozhaj, 228–242 (in Ukrainian). Shevchenko, A.M. et al. (2007). Znachenie mikrovolnovoj tehnologii v narodnom hozyajstve. Mikrovolnovye tehnologii v narodnom hozyajstve, Odessa, 8–9. (in Russian). Smerdov, A.A. & Petrovskij O.M. (2011). Viznachennya optimalnih rezhimiv peredposivnoyi obrobki nasinnya elektromagnitnim polem. Aktualni pitannya biologichnoyi fiziki i himiy. Proceed. VII Int. Sc. Conf. Sevastopil, 44-46 (in Ukrainian). Sytnyk, V.P. (2002). Ekologichni aspekti agropromislovogo kompleksu. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki, 9, 55–57. (in Ukrainian). Tarariko, O.G. et al. (2013). Ocinka vplivu zmin klimatu na produktivnist zernovih kultur ta yih prognozuvannya za suputnikovimi danimi. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki, 10, 10–16 (in Ukrainian). Tuchnyj, V.P. et al. (2007a). Tehnologiya zavtrashnego polya. Mikrovolnovye tehnologii v narodnom hozyajstve, 6, 9–15. (in Russian). Tuchnyj, V.P., Karmazin A.I. & Dzigovskij, Yu.A. (2012).Tehnologiya, kotoruyu zhdut agrarii. Hranenie i pererabotka zerna, 1(151). 21–24. (in Russian). Tuchnyj, V.P., Karmazin Yu.A. & Levchenko Ye.A. (2007b). Proryv s pomoshyu novoj tehnologii. Hranenie i pererabotka zerna, 4(94), 11–13. (in Russian). Turenko, V.P., Bilyk, M.O., Zhukova, L.V., Stankevych, S.V., Zayarna, O.Yu., Lukhanin, I.V., Oleynikov, Ye.S., Batova, O.M., Goryainova, V.V., Poedinceva, A.A. (2019). Dependence of species composition and development of root rots pathogens of spring barley on abiotic factors in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(2), 179–188. Yizhik, M.K. (2001). Silskogospodarske nasinnyeznavstvo. Harkiv (in Ukrainian). Zhukova, L.V., Stankevych, S.V., Turenko, V.P., Bezpal’ko, V.V., Zabrodina, I.V., Bondarenko, S.V., Poedinceva, A.A., Golovan, L.V., Klymenko, I.V., Melenti, V.O. (2019). Root rots of spring barley, their harmfulness and the basic effective protection measures. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(2), 232–238.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave seed treatment gave slightly lower laboratory sprouting energy and germinating power than Vitavax FF.

Taxon
winter wheat and spring barleyHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MWF of EHFe0
Outcome
sprouting energy and germinating powere0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
Vitavax FF, 2.5 L/te0
Setting
laboratorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the seeds were treated with MWF of EHF the average laboratory indices of the sprouting energy and germinating power were slightly lower than in the case with Vitavax FF, 2.5 L/t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat and spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation followed by Mars EL increased winter wheat sprouting energy and germinating power by 2%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
MWF of EHF with the plant growth regulator Mars ELe0
Outcome
sprouting energy and germinating powere0
Direction
highere0
Value
2%e0
Comparator
Vitavax 200 FFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After treating the seeds irradiated with MWF of EHF with the plant growth regulator Mars EL, in 2010–2012, the average sprouting energy and germinating power of winter wheat seeds were higher by 2%, which corresponds to the indices of Vitavax 200 FF case”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–966 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley sowing quality varied with presowing method and variety.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
pre-sowing treatmente0
Outcome
sowing qualitiese0
Direction
variede0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sowing qualities of spring barley seeds varied depending on the method of the pre-sowing treatment and its variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved winter wheat sowing qualities.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
sowing qualitiese0
Direction
positive influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of the pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the plant growth regulators, in general, has a positive influence on the sowing qualities of winter wheat and spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved spring barley sowing qualities.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
sowing qualitiese0
Direction
positive influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of the pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the plant growth regulators, in general, has a positive influence on the sowing qualities of winter wheat and spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved winter wheat field germination.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pre-sowing irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the growth regulatorse0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the pre-sowing irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the growth regulators positively influenced the field germination of winter wheat and spring barley seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved spring barley field germination.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
pre-sowing irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the growth regulatorse0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the pre-sowing irradiation with MWF of EHF with the subsequent treatment with the growth regulators positively influenced the field germination of winter wheat and spring barley seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat field germination was nearly the same under control and Vitavax 200 FF, at 90.0–90.2%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Vitavax 200 FFe0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
practically the samee0
Value
90,0–90,2 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average field germination under control and in the case with the Vitavax 200 FF treating agent was practically the same and amounted to 90,0–90,2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1961 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under unfavorable 2012 conditions, Vitavax 200 FF increased winter wheat field germination 7.8% relative to control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Vitavax 200 FFe0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
7,8 %e0
Qualifier
unfavorable conditions of 2012e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the unfavorable conditions of 2012, the field germination of winter wheat seeds in the Vitavax 200 FF case exceeded the control by 7,8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave irradiation at 1.8 kW/kg for 15 seconds increased winter wheat field germination by 6.9%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
1,8 kW/kg, 15 sec.e0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF in the modes of 1,8 kW/kg, 15 sec. and 0,9 kW/kg, 45 sec. increased the field germination of winter wheat by 6.9 and 7.4 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2116–2300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave irradiation at 0.9 kW/kg for 45 seconds increased winter wheat field germination by 7.4%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
0,9 kW/kg, 45 sec.e0
Outcome
field germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-sowing seed irradiation with MWF of EHF in the modes of 1,8 kW/kg, 15 sec. and 0,9 kW/kg, 45 sec. increased the field germination of winter wheat by 6.9 and 7.4 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2116–2300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment followed by Mars EL raised winter wheat field germination by 9.1–11.8%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MWF of EHF and Mars EL preparatione0
Outcome
highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.1–11.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the cases where the seeds were treated with MWF of EHF and Mars EL preparation, it was higher by 9.1–11.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2412 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

36 papers: 13 positive, 23 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

class · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 23 positive, 10 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.