Paper · 2021 · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Effects of accessions and fertilizer levels on agronomic characteristics, forage biomass yield and nutritive value of lablab (lablab purpureus L) under irrigation in dry lands of Ethiopia

Ashmael Adem; Yeshambel Mekuriaw; Bimrew Asmare

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of the experiment was to evaluate effects of fertilizer level on lablab accessions (Lablab purpureus, (L.) Sweet) agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under irrigation condition. The field study conducted in factorial arrangement of randomized complete block design (RCBD) using two factors (three lablab accessions and four fertilizer levels) with three replications. The three lablab accessions were accession 147, 11640 and Tulu combined with four fertilizer levels of NPS (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg/ha). All levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur (NPS) were applied at time of planting for all lablab accessions. The agronomic characteristics and forage yield data were collected at 50% flowering stage, weighed (for yield estimation), dried and then ground subsamples taken for analysis of crude protein, ash, dry matter, fiber contents, in vitro dry matter digestibility and total digestible nutrients. The collected data were subjected to general linear model for statistical analysis system (SAS) version 9.0. The result indicated that there was significant interaction (P < 0.05) effect in the fertilizer level and accession only in the length and number of leaves per plant, but not for all chemical compositions of lablab. The three accessions showed significant difference (P < 0.001) in the majority of agronomic characteristics. Also fertilizer level showed significant effect (P < 0.001) on the majority of agronomic characteristics. The lablab accessions grown in higher level of NPS fertilizer (150 and 100 kg/ha) had better agronomic performance and dry matter yield than those grown in lower fertilizer levels. Overall, significantly (P < 0.001) maximum dry matter yield (19.6 t/ha) was recorded from Tulu varieties while the lowest dry matter yield (11.21 t/ha) was from lablab accession 147. Regarding fertilizer levels, maximum dry matter yield was recorded from 150 kg fertilizer NPS application (17.03 t/ha) while the lowest (13.5 t/ha) was recorded from control treatment group. The highest CP content (21.6%) was recorded from 11640 lablab accession while the lowest (20.5%) was from Tulu lablab accession. With regard to fertilizer levels, the highest CP content was recorded from 150 kg/ha fertilizer (22.9%) while the lowest (19.4%) CP was recorded from control. Therefore, among tested lablab (Tulu and 11640) accessions with the 100 kg/ha fertilizer rate given priority in terms of their yield and chemical composition and are recommended for wider utilization under smallholder farmers condition in the farming system with similar agro-ecologies using irrigation season. Further research on the economic analysis of cultivars under different systems of production is required to increase viability of this finding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer level by accession interaction was significant (P < 0.05) only for length and number of leaves per plant.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
fertilizer levele0
Outcome
length and number of leaves per plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant interaction (P < 0.05) effect in the fertilizer level and accession only in the length and number of leaves per plant, but not for all chemical compositions of lablab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer level by accession interaction was not significant for the chemical compositions of lablab.

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Treatment
fertilizer levele0
Outcome
chemical compositionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant interaction (P < 0.05) effect in the fertilizer level and accession only in the length and number of leaves per plant, but not for all chemical compositions of lablab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three lablab accessions differed significantly (P < 0.001) in the majority of agronomic characteristics.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Material
three accessionse0
Outcome
agronomic characteristicse0

Verbatim

e0

“The three accessions showed significant difference (P < 0.001) in the majority of agronomic characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer level had a significant effect (P < 0.001) on the majority of agronomic characteristics of lablab.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
fertilizer levele0
Outcome
agronomic characteristicse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer level showed significant effect (P < 0.001) on the majority of agronomic characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab accessions grown at higher NPS fertilizer levels (150 and 100 kg/ha) had better agronomic performance and dry matter yield than those at lower fertilizer levels.

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Treatment
higher level of NPS fertilizer (150 and 100 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
agronomic performance and dry matter yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
lower fertilizer levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lablab accessions grown in higher level of NPS fertilizer (150 and 100 kg/ha) had better agronomic performance and dry matter yield than those grown in lower fertilizer levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tulu had the maximum dry matter yield (19.6 t/ha) among accessions (P < 0.001).

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Material
Tulu varietiese0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
19.6 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“significantly (P < 0.001) maximum dry matter yield (19.6 t/ha) was recorded from Tulu varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1771 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab accession 147 had the lowest dry matter yield (11.21 t/ha).

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Material
accession 147e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.21 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry matter yield (11.21 t/ha) was from lablab accession 147”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha NPS fertilizer gave the maximum dry matter yield (17.03 t/ha) among fertilizer levels.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
150 kg fertilizer NPS applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.03 t/hae0
Comparator
control treatment groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum dry matter yield was recorded from 150 kg fertilizer NPS application (17.03 t/ha) while the lowest (13.5 t/ha) was recorded from control treatment group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2039 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control (no fertilizer) gave the lowest dry matter yield (13.5 t/ha) among fertilizer levels.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
control treatment groupe0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.5 t/hae0
Comparator
150 kg fertilizer NPS applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum dry matter yield was recorded from 150 kg fertilizer NPS application (17.03 t/ha) while the lowest (13.5 t/ha) was recorded from control treatment group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2039 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accession 11640 had the highest crude protein content (21.6%).

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Material
11640e0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest CP content (21.6%) was recorded from 11640 lablab accession while the lowest (20.5%) was from Tulu lablab accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2168 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tulu lablab accession had the lowest crude protein content (20.5%).

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Material
Tulue0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
loweste0
Value
20.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest CP content (21.6%) was recorded from 11640 lablab accession while the lowest (20.5%) was from Tulu lablab accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha fertilizer gave the highest crude protein content (22.9%) among fertilizer levels.

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
150 kg/ha fertilizere0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest CP content was recorded from 150 kg/ha fertilizer (22.9%) while the lowest (19.4%) CP was recorded from control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2327 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized control had the lowest crude protein content (19.4%).

Taxon
lablab purpureus Lt0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
CPe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.4%e0
Comparator
150 kg/ha fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest CP content was recorded from 150 kg/ha fertilizer (22.9%) while the lowest (19.4%) CP was recorded from control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2327 · show in text ↑
t0

“lablab purpureus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the Tulu and 11640 accessions with the 100 kg/ha fertilizer rate for wider use by smallholder farmers under irrigation in similar agro-ecologies.

Taxon
lablabLablabe0
Treatment
100 kg/ha fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
recommended for wider utilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab
Lablab · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among tested lablab (Tulu and 11640) accessions with the 100 kg/ha fertilizer rate given priority in terms of their yield and chemical composition and are recommended for wider utilization under smallholder farmers condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2564 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Lablab purpureus (hyacinth bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lablab purpureus (hyacinth bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · yield · LablabResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lablab purpureus (hyacinth bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · LablabResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.