Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Physiological response of flag leaf and yield formation of winter wheat under different spring restrictive irrigation regimes in the Haihe Plain, China

Xue-jing LIU; Bao-zhong YIN; Zhao-hui HU; et al.

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In order to identify the optimum period of spring water-restrictive irrigation for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Haihe Plain, China and elucidate its effects on flag leaf senescence and yield formation, field experiments were conducted at the Xinji Experimental Station of Hebei Agricultural University from 2016 to 2019 by using different irrigation regimes in spring, including the conventional regime involving two irrigation periods (control (CK), the 3-leaf unfolding stage and the anthesis stage) and a series of single, restrictive irrigation regimes (SRI) comprising irrigation at the 3-leaf unfolding stage (3LI), 4LI, 5LI, and 6LI. There are five major findings: (1) The senescence (determined by the green leaf area, GLA) in the 4LI treatment occurred moderately earlier than that in CK, showed no significant difference with that in 5LI and 6LI, and occurred significantly later than that in 3LI. (2) Compared with other SRI treatments, the GLA value and photosynthetic rate in 4LI were 14.82 and 20.1% higher, respectively. Microstructural analysis of flag leaf also revealed that the mesophyll cells and chloroplasts were irregularly arranged under drought stress in 3LI and 6LI; however, drought stress had minimal negative effects on the microstructure in 4LI and 5LI. (3) Postponed irrigation in spring could significantly increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities in the early stage of grain filling; however, these activities would subsequently decrease. Among the four SRI treatments, the overall enzyme activities were the highest in 4LI, and the combined malondialdehyde (MDA) content in flag leaves in 4LI and 5LI was 14.5% lower on average than that in 3LI and 6LI. (4) The soluble sugar (SS) and proline (Pro) contents in 4LI were the highest among the four SRI treatments; however, they were lower than those in CK. The abscisic acid (ABA) hormone content in 4LI and 5LI was lower than that in 3LI and 6LI, respectively, suggesting a smaller drought stress effect in 4LI and 5LI. (5) In two growing seasons, there was a larger number of spikes per unit area in 4LI (i.e., 13.4% higher than that in 5LI and 6LI) and the 1 000-grain weight in 4LI was the highest among the four SRI treatments (i.e., 6.0% higher than that in the other three SRI treatments). Therefore, a single restrictive irrigation regime at the 4-leaf unfolding stage is recommended to be effective in slowing down the senescence process of flag leaves and achieving high yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf senescence under 4LI was moderately earlier than CK.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
flag leaft0
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The senescence (determined by the green leaf area, GLA) in the 4LI treatment occurred moderately earlier than that in CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
t0

“flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf senescence under 4LI did not significantly differ from 5LI and 6LI.

Treatment
4LIe1
Outcome
senescencee1
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
5LI and 6LIe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“showed no significant difference with that in 5LI and 6LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“The senescence (determined by the green leaf area, GLA) in the 4LI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf senescence under 4LI was significantly later than under 3LI.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume2
Treatment
4LIe1
Outcome
senescencee1
Direction
latere0
Comparator
3LIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“occurred significantly later than that in 3LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“The senescence (determined by the green leaf area, GLA) in the 4LI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GLA under 4LI exceeded other SRI treatments by 14.82%.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
GLA valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.82e0
Comparator
other SRI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with other SRI treatments, the GLA value and photosynthetic rate in 4LI were 14.82 and 20.1% higher, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under 4LI exceeded other SRI treatments by 20.1%.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.1%e0
Comparator
other SRI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with other SRI treatments, the GLA value and photosynthetic rate in 4LI were 14.82 and 20.1% higher, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress under 3LI and 6LI disrupted mesophyll cell and chloroplast arrangement.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
mesophyll cells and chloroplasts were irregularly arrangede0
Qualifier
3LI and 6LIe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mesophyll cells and chloroplasts were irregularly arranged under drought stress in 3LI and 6LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1205 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress minimally affected flag-leaf microstructure under 4LI and 5LI.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
microstructuree0
Direction
minimal negative effectse0
Qualifier
4LI and 5LIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress had minimal negative effects on the microstructure in 4LI and 5LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1296 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponed irrigation increased SOD and CAT activities early in grain filling.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
early stage of grain fillinge0
Treatment
Postponed irrigation in springe0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activitiese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postponed irrigation in spring could significantly increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities in the early stage of grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1454 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD and CAT activities subsequently declined.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume2
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activitiese1
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these activities would subsequently decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1418 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall enzyme activities were highest under 4LI among SRI treatments.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
overall enzyme activitiese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the four SRI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the four SRI treatments, the overall enzyme activities were the highest in 4LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1595 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf MDA content under 4LI and 5LI averaged 14.5% lower than under 3LI and 6LI.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
4LI and 5LIe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14.5%e0
Comparator
3LI and 6LIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined malondialdehyde (MDA) content in flag leaves in 4LI and 5LI was 14.5% lower on average than that in 3LI and 6LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar and proline contents were highest under 4LI among SRI treatments.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
soluble sugar (SS) and proline (Pro) contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the four SRI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble sugar (SS) and proline (Pro) contents in 4LI were the highest among the four SRI treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1834 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar and proline contents under 4LI were lower than CK.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
soluble sugar (SS) and proline (Pro) contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble sugar (SS) and proline (Pro) contents in 4LI were the highest among the four SRI treatments; however, they were lower than those in CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA content under 4LI and 5LI was lower than under 3LI and 6LI, respectively.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LI and 5LIe0
Outcome
abscisic acid (ABA) hormone contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
3LI and 6LIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The abscisic acid (ABA) hormone content in 4LI and 5LI was lower than that in 3LI and 6LI, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1982 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike density under 4LI was 13.4% higher than under 5LI and 6LI.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
number of spikes per unit areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.4%e0
Comparator
5LI and 6LIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a larger number of spikes per unit area in 4LI (i.e., 13.4% higher than that in 5LI and 6LI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2173 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight under 4LI was highest among SRI treatments, 6.0% above the other three.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
4LIe0
Outcome
1 000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.0%e0
Comparator
the other three SRI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1 000-grain weight in 4LI was the highest among the four SRI treatments (i.e., 6.0% higher than that in the other three SRI treatments)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2317 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend one restrictive irrigation at the four-leaf unfolding stage to slow flag-leaf senescence and achieve high yield.

Taxon
winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
a single restrictive irrigation regime at the 4-leaf unfolding stagee0
Outcome
slowing down the senescence process of flag leaves and achieving high yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single restrictive irrigation regime at the 4-leaf unfolding stage is recommended to be effective in slowing down the senescence process of flag leaves and achieving high yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2330–2508 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–118 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.