Paper · 2021 · Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia

Cara Tanam dan Pemupukan Tanaman Kacang Hijau di Lahan Kering Iklim Kering Sumba Timur, Nusa Tenggara Timur

Sri Ayu Dwi Lestari; Sutrisno Sutrisno; Henny Kuntyastuti

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The intercropping method is one way to maximize plants and soil's utilization in a dry land. This study aimed to determine the cultivation (cropping methods and fertilization) that could increase mungbean grain yield in dry land in the dry climate of East Sumba, East Nusa Tenggara Province. The experiment was conducted at dry land in a dry climate in Laipori Village, Pandawai District, East Sumba Regency in 2017. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four replications. The main plot was a cropping pattern, namely (1) intercropping mungbean with maize. Mungbean plant spacing was 30 cm ´ 20 cm, two plants per hole, and maize plant spacing was (50 cm ´ 50 cm) ´ 120 cm, one plant/hole and (2) mungbean monoculture with a plant spacing of 40 cm ´ 10 cm, two plants/hole. The subplot was dosage and type of fertilizer, namely (1) 150 kg Phonska/ha, (2) 5000 kg cow manure/ha, and (3) 75 kg Phonska + 2500 kg cow manure/ha. The mungbean variety used was Vima 1, and the maize variety was Bima. The results showed that intercropping mungbean with maize could increase the yield of mungbean seeds yield by 0,28 t/ha (51,85%) and increase the mungbean biomass by 0,31 t/ha (22,30%) compared to the monoculture system. Different types and dosages of Phonska inorganic fertilizer and cow manure did not cause differences in the mungbean yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping mungbean with maize increased yield of mungbean seeds by 0,28 t/ha (51,85%) versus monoculture.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
intercropping mungbean with maizee0
Outcome
yield of mungbean seedse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0,28 t/hae0
Qualifier
51,85%e0
Comparator
monoculture systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that intercropping mungbean with maize could increase the yield of mungbean seeds yield by 0,28 t/ha (51,85%) and increase the mungbean biomass by 0,31 t/ha (22,30%) compared to the monoculture system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping mungbean with maize increased mungbean biomass by 0,31 t/ha (22,30%) versus monoculture.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
intercropping mungbean with maizee0
Outcome
mungbean biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0,31 t/hae0
Qualifier
22,30%e0
Comparator
monoculture systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that intercropping mungbean with maize could increase the yield of mungbean seeds yield by 0,28 t/ha (51,85%) and increase the mungbean biomass by 0,31 t/ha (22,30%) compared to the monoculture system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phonska and manure types and doses did not change mungbean yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Different types and dosages of Phonska inorganic fertilizer and cow manuree0
Outcome
mungbean yielde0
Direction
did not cause differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different types and dosages of Phonska inorganic fertilizer and cow manure did not cause differences in the mungbean yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1358 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 364 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Cow manure at 3000 kg/ha increased mungbean seed yield.

    Effects Fertilizer on Mungbean Crops and its Residual on Cowpea · 2018 · compared with without fertilizer

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.