Paper · 2019 · Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

Effect of Foliar Application With some Micronutrients on ‘Florida Prince’ Cultivar Peach Tree

Mahmoud Ali; Thanaa Ezz; Nagwa Abd El-Megeed; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out during the two successive seasons 2015 and 2016 on five years old ‘Florida prince’ peach trees (Prunus persica L.) budded on ‘Nemagard’ peach rootstock, grown in sandy soil under drip irrigation system in a private orchard located at El-Nubaria region, El-Behira Governorate, Egypt. The aims of this research was to investigate the effect of some micronutrients foliar as Boric acid (H3BO3), Zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and Fe-EDTA on yield, fruit quality and elemental composition of ‘Florida prince’ peach trees. The followed experimental design was randomized complete block design with five replicates. Results indicated that all the foliar application treatments, significantly increased the yield (kg /tree) and fruit weight (g) as compared with control. The highest yield and fruit weight were recorded with 0.2% Fe-EDTA foliar application treatment (99.85 and 104.40 kg/tree, for two seasons) as compared with the control (36.87 and 37.38 kg/tree, respectively). Moreover, all Boric acid, Zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatments increased length (cm), diameter (cm), firmness (Ib/inch2), total soluble solids (%), acidity (%), and total sugars (%) as compared with control ones during both seasons. On the other hand, A gradual elemental increases in Boron, Iron and Zinc in leaves (%) were recorded with the micronutrient treatments as compared with the control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar micronutrient treatments significantly increased yield per tree and fruit weight compared with the control.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
foliar application treatmentse0
Outcome
yield (kg /tree) and fruit weight (g)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the foliar application treatments, significantly increased the yield (kg /tree) and fruit weight (g) as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield and fruit weight were with 0.2% Fe-EDTA foliar application (99.85 and 104.40 kg/tree in two seasons) versus control (36.87 and 37.38 kg/tree).

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
0.2% Fe-EDTA foliar application treatmente0
Outcome
yield and fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
99.85 and 104.40 kg/treee0
Qualifier
36.87 and 37.38 kg/treee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield and fruit weight were recorded with 0.2% Fe-EDTA foliar application treatment (99.85 and 104.40 kg/tree, for two seasons) as compared with the control (36.87 and 37.38 kg/tree, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid, zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatments increased fruit length, diameter and firmness compared with control in both seasons.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Boric acid, Zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
length (cm), diameter (cm), firmness (Ib/inch2)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all Boric acid, Zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatments increased length (cm), diameter (cm), firmness (Ib/inch2), total soluble solids (%), acidity (%), and total sugars (%) as compared with control ones during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same foliar treatments increased fruit total soluble solids, acidity and total sugars compared with control in both seasons.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Boric acid, Zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
total soluble solids (%), acidity (%), and total sugars (%)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all Boric acid, Zinc sulphate and Fe-EDTA foliar treatments increased length (cm), diameter (cm), firmness (Ib/inch2), total soluble solids (%), acidity (%), and total sugars (%) as compared with control ones during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf boron, iron and zinc contents increased gradually with the micronutrient treatments compared with control plants.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
micronutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
Boron, Iron and Zinc in leaves (%)e0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gradual elemental increases in Boron, Iron and Zinc in leaves (%) were recorded with the micronutrient treatments as compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑

boric acid · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boric acid · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

iron atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.