Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development

Evaluation of tillage practices on selected soil chemical properties, maize yield and net return in O. R. Tambo District, South Africa

Mtyobile Mxolisi; Mhlontlo Simphiwo

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The costs of maize production per ha in the Eastern Cape Province are escalating due to an increase in mechanization and input costs. Conservation agriculture (CA) has been identified as one of the systems that can reduce costs of production and improve maize productivity. Most famers in the district still require tangible evidence on the benefits and impacts of minimal soil disturbance. Hence it was necessary to conduct this comparison between tillage practices on maize productivity. Ten projects under conventional tillage (CT) were randomly selected from maize cropping in three local municipalities of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa. Minimum tillage (MT) demonstration fields on maize production measuring 1 to 5 ha were conducted in the aforementioned local municipalities and were compared to project under conventional tillage. Minimum tillage recorded an increase in P (46 mg/L) and K (227 mg/L) concentration; whereas Ca (395.6 mg/L) and Mg (406.75 mg/L) concentration were higher under conventional tillage at 0 to 10 cm soil sampling depth. Soil pH was not affected by tillage practices. Minimum tillage recorded an average increase in maize yield from 2.3 to 4.78 tons per ha compared to 4.16 tons per under conventional tillage. The greatest gross margin was observed from minimum tillage (US $273.92) compared to conventional tillage which had the lowest (US $207.02) gross margin. The short term comparison between the tillage practices revealed that minimum tillage had higher levels of P and K soil macro elements, increase in maize grain yield and subsequent high net benefits relative to conventional tillage. Therefore, it is necessary to scale up the adoption of minimum tillage in the district coupled with crop rotation and residue retention so that the majority of farmers can realize its benefits. Key words: Gross margin, tillage, nutrients, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage increased soil P concentration to 46 mg/L.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
46 mg/Le0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum tillage recorded an increase in P (46 mg/L) and K (227 mg/L) concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage increased soil K concentration to 227 mg/L.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Value
227 mg/Le0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum tillage recorded an increase in P (46 mg/L) and K (227 mg/L) concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had higher soil Ca concentration of 395.6 mg/L at 0 to 10 cm depth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
highere0
Value
395.6 mg/Le0
Qualifier
0 to 10 cm soil sampling depthe0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ca (395.6 mg/L) and Mg (406.75 mg/L) concentration were higher under conventional tillage at 0 to 10 cm soil sampling depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had higher soil Mg concentration of 406.75 mg/L at 0 to 10 cm depth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
highere0
Value
406.75 mg/Le0
Qualifier
0 to 10 cm soil sampling depthe0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ca (395.6 mg/L) and Mg (406.75 mg/L) concentration were higher under conventional tillage at 0 to 10 cm soil sampling depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was not affected by tillage practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
Soil pHe0
Direction
not affectede0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil pH was not affected by tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage raised maize yield from 2.3 to 4.78 tons per ha, versus 4.16 tons under conventional tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.78 tons per hae0
Qualifier
4.16 tons pere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum tillage recorded an average increase in maize yield from 2.3 to 4.78 tons per ha compared to 4.16 tons per under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage gave a greater gross margin of US $273.92 than conventional tillage at US $207.02.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
greateste0
Value
US $273.92e0
Qualifier
US $207.02e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
Eastern Cape Province in South Africae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The greatest gross margin was observed from minimum tillage (US $273.92) compared to conventional tillage which had the lowest (US $207.02) gross margin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eastern Cape Province in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–652 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wider adoption of minimum tillage with crop rotation and residue retention.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
scale up the adoption of minimum tillage in the district coupled with crop rotation and residue retentione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“scale up the adoption of minimum tillage in the district coupled with crop rotation and residue retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1780 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.