Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Some Biochemical and Morphological Characteristics of Wheat under Drought Conditions

Seyede Yalda Raeesi Sadati; Soodabeh Jahanbakhsh Godekahriz; Ali Ebadi; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on some biochemical and morphological characteristics of wheat under drought stress and reduction of drought effects under the influence of zinc nano oxide foliar application. Materials and Methods: A factorial experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications in the University of Mohaghegh Ardebili in 2016-2017. The first factor was drought stress at three levels (35, 60 and 85% of field capacity), the second factor was wheat cultivars (Mihan, Heydari, Sysons and Gasogen) and the third factor included foliar spraying with zinc oxide nanoparticles with concentrations of 0, 0.5 and 1 g.l-1. The foliar application was performed in three-leaf stage and three days after foliar application, drought stress was applied based on field capacity and sampling was performed ten days after stress. Results: The findings showed that under ZnO treatment, the amount of soluble protein, soluble sugar, proline, plant height and grain weight increased. As the severity of drought stress increased, the amount of protein decreased, but the amount of proline and soluble sugar increased. Stress also decreased plant height, dry and fresh root weight, as well as grain yield (15.95% of grain size and 11.93% of grain weight). Spraying wheat plants with zinc nano oxide in the Mihan and Heydari cultivars moderated the effects of stress, and in the cultivars of Sysons and Gascogen increased the plant's defense mechanisms against the destructive effects of drought stress. Conclusion: In general, foliar feeding of ZnO at a concentration of 0.5 g.l-1 makes wheat plants tolerant to drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under ZnO treatment, soluble protein, soluble sugar and proline increased in drought-stressed wheat.

Treatment
ZnO treatmente1
Outcome
soluble protein, soluble sugar, prolinee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“under ZnO treatment, the amount of soluble protein, soluble sugar, proline, plant height and grain weight increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under ZnO treatment, plant height and grain weight of wheat increased.

Treatment
ZnO treatmente1
Outcome
plant height and grain weighte1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“under ZnO treatment, the amount of soluble protein, soluble sugar, proline, plant height and grain weight increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing drought stress decreased the amount of protein in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
amount of proteine2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“As the severity of drought stress increased, the amount of protein decreased, but the amount of proline and soluble sugar increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing drought stress increased the amount of proline and soluble sugar in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
amount of proline and soluble sugare2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“As the severity of drought stress increased, the amount of protein decreased, but the amount of proline and soluble sugar increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased plant height, dry and fresh root weight of wheat.

Treatment
Stresse3
Outcome
plant height, dry and fresh root weighte3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stress also decreased plant height, dry and fresh root weight, as well as grain yield (15.95% of grain size and 11.93% of grain weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased grain size of wheat by 15.95%.

Treatment
Stresse3
Outcome
grain sizee3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
15.95%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stress also decreased plant height, dry and fresh root weight, as well as grain yield (15.95% of grain size and 11.93% of grain weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased grain weight of wheat by 11.93%.

Treatment
Stresse3
Outcome
grain weighte3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
11.93%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stress also decreased plant height, dry and fresh root weight, as well as grain yield (15.95% of grain size and 11.93% of grain weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc nano oxide moderated the effects of drought stress in the Mihan and Heydari wheat cultivars.

Material
Mihan and Heydarie4
Treatment
zinc nano oxidee4
Outcome
effects of stresse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying wheat plants with zinc nano oxide in the Mihan and Heydari cultivars moderated the effects of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc nano oxide increased defense mechanisms in the Sysons and Gascogen wheat cultivars.

Material
Sysons and Gascogene5
Treatment
zinc nano oxidee4
Outcome
defense mechanismse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Wheat under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying wheat plants with zinc nano oxide in the Mihan and Heydari cultivars moderated the effects of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1474 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the cultivars of Sysons and Gascogen increased the plant's defense mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnO at 0.5 g.l-1 made wheat plants tolerant to drought stress.

Treatment
foliar feeding of ZnO at a concentration of 0.5 g.l-1e6
Outcome
tolerant to drought stresse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“foliar feeding of ZnO at a concentration of 0.5 g.l-1 makes wheat plants tolerant to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1735 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

micronutrient · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.