Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Water used studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with limited irrigation and moisture conservation practices

MN Wairagade; AA Choudhary; NR Mairan; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agronomy Farm, College of Agriculture, Nagpur during rabi season of 2019-20. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with 12 treatment combinations, replicated thrice. The treatments consisted of three irrigation levels [Only one irrigation at late jointing stage (I1), Two irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and flowering stages (I2) and Three irrigations at CRI, late jointing and flowering stages (I3)] combined with four moisture conservation practices [Control (M0), Mulching with wheat straw (M1), Mulching with weed biomass (M2) and Antitranspirant spray {Kaolin @ 5%} (M3)] adopted at 30 DAS. Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices. Application of three irrigations recorded significantly highest consumptive use of water and lowest water use efficiency. Similarly, application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS recorded significantly lowest consumptive use and highest water use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations significantly increased Growth and yield parameters of wheat relative to lower irrigation levels.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
Growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
its lower levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations significantly increased grain of wheat relative to lower irrigation levels.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
its lower levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations significantly increased straw yield of wheat relative to lower irrigation levels.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
its lower levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS significantly increased Growth and yield parameters of wheat relative to other moisture conservation practices.

Treatment
wheat straw mulch at 30 DASe0
Outcome
Growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS significantly increased grain of wheat relative to other moisture conservation practices.

Treatment
wheat straw mulch at 30 DASe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS significantly increased straw yield of wheat relative to other moisture conservation practices.

Treatment
wheat straw mulch at 30 DASe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters along with grain and straw yield of wheat were significantly higher with application of three irrigations compared to its lower levels as well as with application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS over rest of the moisture conservation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations produced the highest consumptive water use.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
consumptive use of watere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of three irrigations recorded significantly highest consumptive use of water and lowest water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations produced the lowest water use efficiency.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of three irrigations recorded significantly highest consumptive use of water and lowest water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS produced the lowest consumptive water use.

Treatment
wheat straw mulch at 30 DASe0
Outcome
consumptive usee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS recorded significantly lowest consumptive use and highest water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS produced the highest water use efficiency.

Treatment
wheat straw mulch at 30 DASe0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, application of wheat straw mulch at 30 DAS recorded significantly lowest consumptive use and highest water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑

organic · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.