Paper · 2021 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

Formation of the quality of barley grain with modern technologies in the Volga region

Oleg Ivanovich Goryanin; Baurzhan Zhunuzovich Dzhangabaev; Liliya Vladimirovna Pronovich

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The article presents studies in the six-field grain-fallow crop rotation (2011-2018) to determine the impact of various technologies on the quality of spring barley grain in the chernozem steppe of the Middle Volga region. During the years of research in 2011, 2014 and 2017, favorable conditions for the growth of cultural development were noted (SCC for May–July 0.64-1.33). In 2015 and 2018 – unfavorable (SCC 0.45-0.53), in the rest – conditions were close to normal. It is established that intensive technologies with minimal tillage, without reducing the yield of barley, in comparison with the traditional one, do not worsen the indicators of the nature and weight of 1000 seeds. The grain quality indicators were significantly influenced by the SCC of the growing season of the crop. Improving the moisture content of crops contributed to an increase in the nature of grain from 614.0-627.4 g / l to 641.2-655.6 g / l (2.4-6.5 %), the weight of 1000 seeds from 35.2-37.2 g to 42.1-44.2 g (14.2-23.0 %). The highest protein content was found in dry years – 12.2-13.8 %, which is 0.1-2.1% more than in wet years, while the combined use of intensification agents (fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides) on technologies with minimal tillage provided a greater degree of protein stabilization in different weather conditions in years. To increase the efficiency, yield and stabilization of grain quality at the level of the required indicators, a technology with minimal tillage, complex application of plant protection products against pests and weeds, and pre-sowing application of ammonium nitrate N30 is proposed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal tillage technologies did not reduce barley yield versus traditional technology.

Treatment
intensive technologies with minimal tillagee0
Outcome
yield of barleye0
Direction
without reducinge0
Comparator
traditional onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“intensive technologies with minimal tillage, without reducing the yield of barley, in comparison with the traditional one, do not worsen the indicators of the nature and weight of 1000 seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal tillage technologies did not worsen grain nature or thousand seed weight.

Treatment
intensive technologies with minimal tillagee0
Outcome
nature and weight of 1000 seedse0
Direction
do not worsene0
Comparator
traditional onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“intensive technologies with minimal tillage, without reducing the yield of barley, in comparison with the traditional one, do not worsen the indicators of the nature and weight of 1000 seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–685 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing season SCC significantly influenced barley grain quality.

Outcome
grain quality indicatorse0
Setting
growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain quality indicators were significantly influenced by the SCC of the growing season of the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–791 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater crop moisture increased grain nature by 2.4-6.5%.

Treatment
Improving the moisture content of cropse0
Outcome
nature of graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.4-6.5 %e0
Qualifier
614.0-627.4 g / l to 641.2-655.6 g / le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improving the moisture content of crops contributed to an increase in the nature of grain from 614.0-627.4 g / l to 641.2-655.6 g / l (2.4-6.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–937 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater moisture increased thousand seed weight by 14.2-23.0%.

Treatment
Improving the moisture content of cropse1
Outcome
weight of 1000 seedse0
Direction
increasee1
Value
14.2-23.0 %e0
Qualifier
35.2-37.2 g to 42.1-44.2 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“the weight of 1000 seeds from 35.2-37.2 g to 42.1-44.2 g (14.2-23.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“Improving the moisture content of crops contributed to an increase in the nature of grain from 614.0-627.4 g / l to 641.2-655.6 g / l (2.4-6.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–937 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry years had higher barley grain protein content than wet years.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.2-13.8 %e0
Qualifier
0.1-2.1% moree0
Comparator
wet yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest protein content was found in dry years – 12.2-13.8 %, which is 0.1-2.1% more than in wet years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined intensification agents under minimal tillage stabilized protein across weather conditions.

Treatment
combined use of intensification agents (fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides) on technologies with minimal tillagee0
Outcome
protein stabilizatione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined use of intensification agents (fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides) on technologies with minimal tillage provided a greater degree of protein stabilization in different weather conditions in years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose minimal tillage, plant protection and pre-sowing ammonium nitrate N30.

Outcome
a technology with minimal tillage, complex application of plant protection products against pests and weeds, and pre-sowing application of ammonium nitrate N30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“a technology with minimal tillage, complex application of plant protection products against pests and weeds, and pre-sowing application of ammonium nitrate N30 is proposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1619 · show in text ↑

insecticide · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

tillage · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Two irrigations with 90 kg nitrogen per hectare gave the highest protein content compared with the other irrigation and nitrogen treatments.

    Effect of levels of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake in barley · 2019 · compared with other irrigations (no irrigation, one irrigation at tillering stage, one irrigation at flag leaf stage) and nitrogen treatments (0, 30 and 60 kg ha-1)

    Same direction

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 64 positive, 15 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

herbicide · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.