Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of foliar application of potassium nitrate on late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in mitigating terminal heat stress

K.N. Singh; Hemant Kumar Singh

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An investigation of on farm trial (OFT) conducted on farmer’s field during Rabi season 2016-17 & 2017-18 in Kishanganj district of Bihar for studies on ‘Effect of foliar application of potassium nitrate on late sown wheat in mitigating terminal heat stress’ revealed that the foliar application of 0.5 % KNO3 at booting and 0.5 % KNO3 at anthesis stage of wheat recorded higher grain yield (31.50 and 30.30 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) followed by foliar application of 1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stage of wheat (29.75 and 28.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) in comparison to wheat yield obtained under farmer practice of without any foliar application (28.50 and 25.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively).The two spray of KNO3 0.5% at boot and anthesis stage on wheat showed the favorable effect on yield attributing characters(plant height, effective tillers/m2,spike length, number of grains/spike and test weight). This treatment also recorded higher net return and B:C ratio (Rs. 28,250/ha, 2.49) during 2016-17 and that (Rs. 24,450/ha, 2.27) during 2017-18 respectively. The application of KNO3 at the stage of booting and anthesis stage found effective in increasing the yield of late sown wheat variety HD-2985 in Kishanganj district of Bihar. Farmers were satisfied with the performance of the technology in mitigating heat stress in late sown wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave 31.50 q/ha grain yield in 2016-17, above farmer practice.

Treatment
0.5 % KNO3 at booting and 0.5 % KNO3 at anthesis stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.50e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0
Comparator
farmer practice of without any foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 0.5 % KNO3 at booting and 0.5 % KNO3 at anthesis stage of wheat recorded higher grain yield (31.50 and 30.30 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) followed by foliar application of 1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stage of wheat (29.75 and 28.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) in comparison to wheat yield obtained under farmer practice of without any foliar application (28.50 and 25.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave 30.30 q/ha grain yield in 2017-18, above farmer practice.

Treatment
0.5 % KNO3 at booting and 0.5 % KNO3 at anthesis stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.30 q/hae0
Qualifier
2017-18e0
Comparator
farmer practice of without any foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 0.5 % KNO3 at booting and 0.5 % KNO3 at anthesis stage of wheat recorded higher grain yield (31.50 and 30.30 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) followed by foliar application of 1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stage of wheat (29.75 and 28.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) in comparison to wheat yield obtained under farmer practice of without any foliar application (28.50 and 25.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.0% KNO3 anthesis spray gave 29.75 q/ha grain yield in 2016-17.

Treatment
1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stagee0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
29.75e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0
Comparator
farmer practice of without any foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stage of wheat (29.75 and 28.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) in comparison to wheat yield obtained under farmer practice of without any foliar application (28.50 and 25.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.0% KNO3 anthesis spray gave 28.50 q/ha grain yield in 2017-18.

Treatment
1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stagee0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
28.50 q/hae0
Qualifier
2017-18e0
Comparator
farmer practice of without any foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 1.0 % KNO3 only at anthesis stage of wheat (29.75 and 28.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively) in comparison to wheat yield obtained under farmer practice of without any foliar application (28.50 and 25.50 q/ha in 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays favorably affected plant height, tillers, and spike length.

Treatment
two spray of KNO3 0.5% at boot and anthesis stagee0
Outcome
plant height, effective tillers/m2,spike lengthe0
Direction
favorable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two spray of KNO3 0.5% at boot and anthesis stage on wheat showed the favorable effect on yield attributing characters(plant height, effective tillers/m2,spike length, number of grains/spike and test weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays favorably affected grains per spike and test weight.

Treatment
two spray of KNO3 0.5% at boot and anthesis stagee0
Outcome
number of grains/spike and test weighte0
Direction
favorable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two spray of KNO3 0.5% at boot and anthesis stage on wheat showed the favorable effect on yield attributing characters(plant height, effective tillers/m2,spike length, number of grains/spike and test weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave net return of Rs. 28,250/ha in 2016-17.

Treatment
potassium nitratet0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 28,250/hae0
Qualifier
2016-17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher net return and B:C ratio (Rs. 28,250/ha, 2.49) during 2016-17 and that (Rs. 24,450/ha, 2.27) during 2017-18 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“potassium nitrate on late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave B:C ratio of 2.49 in 2016-17.

Treatment
potassium nitratet0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.49e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher net return and B:C ratio (Rs. 28,250/ha, 2.49) during 2016-17 and that (Rs. 24,450/ha, 2.27) during 2017-18 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“potassium nitrate on late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave net return of Rs. 24,450/ha in 2017-18.

Treatment
potassium nitratet0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 24,450/hae0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher net return and B:C ratio (Rs. 28,250/ha, 2.49) during 2016-17 and that (Rs. 24,450/ha, 2.27) during 2017-18 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“potassium nitrate on late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 0.5% KNO3 sprays gave B:C ratio of 2.27 in 2017-18.

Treatment
potassium nitratet0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.27e0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher net return and B:C ratio (Rs. 28,250/ha, 2.49) during 2016-17 and that (Rs. 24,450/ha, 2.27) during 2017-18 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“potassium nitrate on late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–68 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.