Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Crop geometry and nitrogen management impacts on cotton cultivar H-1098(i) productivity

KAPIL MALIK; A K MEHTA; S K THAKRAL; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field investigation was undertaken to study plant geometry and nitrogen management on performance of cotton variety H-1098 (i). The experiment was conducted during kharif 2015 at CRS, Sirsa, Haryana, in split plot design with 3 replications consisting of four spacing of cotton crop in main plots while four levels of nitrogen in subplots. Experimental results revealed that among different crop geometries, significantly higher plant population, plant height and LAI was observed with 67.5 cm × 10 cm spacing than rest spacing’s treatments however weight of boll was not affected by different plant geometry. Wider spacing (67.5 cm × 30 cm) had higher dry matter accumulation, sympodial branches and number of bolls per plant but yield of seed cotton was recorded highest under 67.5 cm × 15 cm spacing than recommended spacing (67.5 cm × 30 cm). Periodic growth parameters like plant height and leaf area index (LAI) significantly increased with 25% increase in nitrogen dose over recommended dose of nitrogen however plant population was not significantly influenced by different nitrogen doses. Higher dry matter accumulation observed with 150% recommended dose of nitrogen over rest of treatments but number of sympodial branches was maximum at 100% of recommended nitrogen dose which remained statistically at par with further increased in nitrogen doses. Seed cotton yield and the number of bolls/plant increased significantly with 125% RDN over 100% and 75% of recommended nitrogen dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 67.5 cm × 10 cm significantly increased plant population, height and LAI relative to other spacings.

Treatment
67.5 cm × 10 cm spacinge0
Outcome
plant population, plant height and LAIe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest spacing’s treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher plant population, plant height and LAI was observed with 67.5 cm × 10 cm spacing than rest spacing’s treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant geometry did not affect boll weight.

Treatment
different plant geometrye0
Outcome
weight of bolle0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of boll was not affected by different plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased dry matter, sympodial branches and bolls per plant.

Treatment
Wider spacing (67.5 cm × 30 cm)e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, sympodial branches and number of bolls per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing (67.5 cm × 30 cm) had higher dry matter accumulation, sympodial branches and number of bolls per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was highest at 67.5 cm × 15 cm spacing compared with recommended spacing.

Treatment
67.5 cm × 15 cm spacinge0
Outcome
yield of seed cottone0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
recommended spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of seed cotton was recorded highest under 67.5 cm × 15 cm spacing than recommended spacing (67.5 cm × 30 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose by 25% above recommendation significantly increased height and LAI.

Treatment
25% increase in nitrogen dosee0
Outcome
plant height and leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended dose of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and leaf area index (LAI) significantly increased with 25% increase in nitrogen dose over recommended dose of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen doses did not significantly influence plant population.

Treatment
different nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
plant populatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant population was not significantly influenced by different nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150% recommended nitrogen gave higher dry matter accumulation than other treatments.

Treatment
150% recommended dose of nitrogene0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
rest of treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher dry matter accumulation observed with 150% recommended dose of nitrogen over rest of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sympodial branches were maximum at recommended nitrogen and statistically at par with higher doses.

Treatment
100% of recommended nitrogen dosee0
Outcome
number of sympodial branchese0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
further increased in nitrogen dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches was maximum at 100% of recommended nitrogen dose which remained statistically at par with further increased in nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDN significantly increased seed cotton yield and bolls per plant over 100% and 75% doses.

Treatment
125% RDNe0
Outcome
Seed cotton yield and the number of bolls/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
100% and 75% of recommended nitrogen dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield and the number of bolls/plant increased significantly with 125% RDN over 100% and 75% of recommended nitrogen dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1495 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.