Paper · 2018 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

RESPONSE OF SUPERIOR GRAPEVINES GROWN UNDER MINIA REGION CONDITIONS TO SPRAYING WHEAT SEED SPROUT EXTRACT AND NANO-BORON

Haitham Mohamed Allam Mohamed

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation was conducted over two seasons of 2016 and 2017to elucidate the impact of single and combined applications of wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2% and nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1 % in fruiting of Superiorgrapevines. The selected vines received three sprays at growth start, just afterberry setting and one month later. Carrying out three sprays of wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1% substantiallyimproved main shoot length, surface area, N, P, K, B, yield, cluster weight anddimensions, berry weight, while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment. The promotion on growth, yield and berriesquality was in proportional to the increase in concentrations of wheat seedsprout and nano-boron. A slight effect on these parameters was observed withincreasing concentrations of wheat seed sprout from 1 to 2 % and nano-boronfrom 0.05 to 0.1 %. Using wheat seed sprout extract was preferable than usingnano-boron in this respect. Combined application was superior than using eachmaterial alone in this connection. Carrying out three sprays at growth start,just after berry setting and one month later of a mixture of wheat seed sprout at1% and nano-boron at 0.05 % was necessary for promoting yield and berriesquality and at the same time reducing shoot berries of Superior grapevinesgrown under Minia region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays improved shoot length and surface area relative to control.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%e0
Outcome
main shoot length, surface areae0
Direction
substantiallyimprovede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Carrying out three sprays of wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1% substantiallyimproved main shoot length, surface area, N, P, K, B, yield, cluster weight anddimensions, berry weight, while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUPERIOR GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays improved N, P, K and B relative to control.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%e0
Outcome
N, P, K, Be0
Direction
substantiallyimprovede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Carrying out three sprays of wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1% substantiallyimproved main shoot length, surface area, N, P, K, B, yield, cluster weight anddimensions, berry weight, while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays improved yield, cluster weight and dimensions, and berry weight.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%e0
Outcome
yield, cluster weight anddimensions, berry weighte0
Direction
substantiallyimprovede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Carrying out three sprays of wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1% substantiallyimproved main shoot length, surface area, N, P, K, B, yield, cluster weight anddimensions, berry weight, while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays reduced shot berries percentage.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%e1
Outcome
shot berries %e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays reduced total acidity percentage.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%e1
Outcome
total acidity %e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“while reduced shot berries % and total acidity %relative to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedsprout at 0.5 to 2 % and/or nano-boron at 0.025 to 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth, yield and berry quality improved with higher spray concentrations.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seedsprout and nano-borone0
Outcome
growth, yield and berriesqualitye0
Direction
promotione0

Verbatim

e0

“The promotion on growth, yield and berriesquality was in proportional to the increase in concentrations of wheat seedsprout and nano-boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing extract from 1 to 2% had only a slight effect.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seed sprout from 1 to 2 %e0
Outcome
these parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A slight effect on these parameters was observed withincreasing concentrations of wheat seed sprout from 1 to 2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nano-boron from 0.05 to 0.1% had only a slight effect.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
nano-boronfrom 0.05 to 0.1 %e0
Outcome
these parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A slight effect on these parameters was observed withincreasing concentrations of wheat seed sprout from 1 to 2 % and nano-boronfrom 0.05 to 0.1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed sprout extract was preferable to nano-boron.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
wheat seed sprout extracte0
Outcome
preferablee0
Direction
preferablee0
Comparator
nano-borone0

Verbatim

e0

“Using wheat seed sprout extract was preferable than usingnano-boron in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application was superior to either material alone.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
Combined applicatione0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
eachmaterial alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application was superior than using eachmaterial alone in this connection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended three timed sprays of 1% extract plus 0.05% nano-boron to promote yield and quality and reduce shot berries.

Taxon
Superior grapevinese0
Treatment
a mixture of wheat seed sprout at1% and nano-boron at 0.05 %e0
Outcome
promoting yield and berriesquality and at the same time reducing shoot berriese0
Setting
Minia regione0

Verbatim

e0

“Carrying out three sprays at growth start,just after berry setting and one month later of a mixture of wheat seed sprout at1% and nano-boron at 0.05 % was necessary for promoting yield and berriesquality and at the same time reducing shoot berries of Superior grapevinesgrown under Minia region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1377 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · VitisResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.