Paper · 2014 · SSRN Electronic Journal

Effect of Irrigation Levels on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat

M. N. Atikullah; Ripon Kumar Sikder; M. Asif; et al.

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during November 2012 to March 2013 in experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh to find out the consequence of irrigation levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat (BARI Gom-26). Four different irrigation levels viz. I0: No irrigation i.e. control; I1: Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS) at crown root initiation stage; I2: Irrigation at 55 DAS at flowering stage) and I3: Irrigation at 75 DAS at grain filling stage were used in the experiment using Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Results revealed that maximum dry matter content (18.8 g/plant), crop growth rate (CGR) (13.5 g m-2day-1), relative growth rate (RGR) (0.024 g m-2day-1) were found from I1 which was statistically identical with I2 whereas minimum from I0. Plant height (80.7 cm), number of tiller (4.9/hill), number of spike (4.7/hill), number of spikelets (18.5/spike), spike length (19.2 cm), filled grains (29.3/spike), total grains (31.3/spike), 1000-grains weight (44.4 g), yield (grain 3.4 t/ha, straw 5.7 t/ha and biological 9.1 t/ha) and harvest index were correspondingly showed higher results as of growth characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20 days gave maximum dry matter content, statistically identical to irrigation at 55 days, versus a minimum without irrigation.

Treatment
Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
18.8 g/plante0
Qualifier
statistically identical with I2e0
Comparator
I0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum dry matter content (18.8 g/plant), crop growth rate (CGR) (13.5 g m-2day-1), relative growth rate (RGR) (0.024 g m-2day-1) were found from I1 which was statistically identical with I2 whereas minimum from I0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“I1: Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS) at crown root initiation stage; I2: Irrigation at 55 DAS at flowering stage) and I3: Irrigation at 75 DAS at grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20 days gave maximum crop growth rate, statistically identical to irrigation at 55 days.

Treatment
Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
minimum from I0e0
Value
13.5 g m-2day-1e0
Comparator
I0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop growth rate (CGR) (13.5 g m-2day-1), relative growth rate (RGR) (0.024 g m-2day-1) were found from I1 which was statistically identical with I2 whereas minimum from I0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“I1: Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS) at crown root initiation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20 days gave maximum relative growth rate, statistically identical to irrigation at 55 days.

Treatment
Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
minimum from I0e0
Value
0.024 g m-2day-1e0
Comparator
I0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative growth rate (RGR) (0.024 g m-2day-1) were found from I1 which was statistically identical with I2 whereas minimum from I0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“I1: Irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS) at crown root initiation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment with higher growth also had higher wheat plant height and tiller number.

Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
80.7 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height (80.7 cm), number of tiller (4.9/hill), number of spike (4.7/hill), number of spikelets (18.5/spike), spike length (19.2 cm), filled grains (29.3/spike), total grains (31.3/spike), 1000-grains weight (44.4 g), yield (grain 3.4 t/ha, straw 5.7 t/ha and biological 9.1 t/ha) and harvest index were correspondingly showed higher results as of growth characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat tiller number reached 4.9 per hill with the higher performing treatment.

Outcome
number of tillere0
Value
4.9/hille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of tiller (4.9/hill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat spike number reached 4.7 per hill.

Outcome
number of spikee0
Value
4.7/hille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spike (4.7/hill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat spikelets reached 18.5 per spike.

Outcome
number of spikeletse0
Value
18.5/spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikelets (18.5/spike)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat spike length reached 19.2 cm.

Outcome
spike lengthe0
Value
19.2 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (19.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat filled grains reached 29.3 per spike.

Outcome
filled grainse0
Value
29.3/spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“filled grains (29.3/spike)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat total grains reached 31.3 per spike.

Outcome
total grainse0
Value
31.3/spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total grains (31.3/spike)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat 1000-grain weight reached 44.4 g.

Outcome
1000-grains weighte0
Value
44.4 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grains weight (44.4 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield reached 3.4 t/ha.

Outcome
graine0
Value
3.4 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (grain 3.4 t/ha, straw 5.7 t/ha and biological 9.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield reached 5.7 t/ha.

Outcome
strawe0
Value
5.7 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (grain 3.4 t/ha, straw 5.7 t/ha and biological 9.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat biological yield reached 9.1 t/ha.

Outcome
biologicale0
Value
9.1 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (grain 3.4 t/ha, straw 5.7 t/ha and biological 9.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat harvest index was higher with the higher performing growth treatment.

Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index were correspondingly showed higher results as of growth characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.