Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Mitigation of High-Temperature Damage by Application of Kaolin and Pinolene on Young Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.): A Preliminary Experiment to Assess Biometric, Eco-Physiological and Nutraceutical Parameters

Aurora Cirillo; Stefano Conti; Giulia Graziani; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Various products are used to mitigate the negative effects of abiotic stress in olive trees. The aim of the research was to examine an anti-transpirant product (Vapor Gard®, V) and a kaolin- based product (Manisol, K) effect on the growth of two-year-old olive tree seedlings under high temperature. The study was conducted in a greenhouse on trees of a native cultivar of Campania (cv. Salella) grown in pot during the growing season from May to September 2020. The experimental design included two products: di-1-p-menthene (product V) and kaolin (product K), applied five times at 20 day intervals compared with a control. The following biometric, physiological, and nutraceutical parameters were evaluated: stomatal conductance, chlorophyll a fluorescence, Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) index, relative water content (RWC), shoots growth, total leaf area per plant, trunk cross-sectional area, dry matter partitioning, total polyphenols, and antioxidant activity. The results obtained showed that the application of di-1-p-menthene (V) was able to induce a significant improvement of shoots growth (+37.22%) and trunk cross-sectional area (+46.60%) and a reduction of the stomatal conductance and an increase of leaf RWC values. Application with kaolin had positive effects on the total polyphenol content, with an increase over the control of 240.33% and higher antioxidant activity values. Further studies are necessary to determine the effect of these products on the biometric, physiological and nutraceutical parameters of mature olive trees cultivated in open field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-1-p-menthene increased shoot growth by 37.22% against control.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
di-1-p-menthene (V)e0
Outcome
shoots growthe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
+37.22%e0
Comparator
a controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of di-1-p-menthene (V) was able to induce a significant improvement of shoots growth (+37.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied five times at 20 day intervals compared with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-1-p-menthene increased trunk cross-sectional area by 46.60% against control.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
di-1-p-menthene (V)e0
Outcome
trunk cross-sectional areae0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
+46.60%e0
Comparator
a controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of di-1-p-menthene (V) was able to induce a significant improvement of shoots growth (+37.22%) and trunk cross-sectional area (+46.60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied five times at 20 day intervals compared with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-1-p-menthene reduced stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
di-1-p-menthene (V)e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
a controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of di-1-p-menthene (V) was able to induce a significant improvement of shoots growth (+37.22%) and trunk cross-sectional area (+46.60%) and a reduction of the stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1205 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-1-p-menthene increased leaf relative water content.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
di-1-p-menthene (V)e1
Outcome
leaf RWC valuese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
a controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of leaf RWC values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1240 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of di-1-p-menthene (V)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1048 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin raised total polyphenol content by 240.33% over control.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
kaoline0
Outcome
total polyphenol contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
240.33%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application with kaolin had positive effects on the total polyphenol content, with an increase over the control of 240.33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin produced higher antioxidant activity values.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
kaoline0
Outcome
antioxidant activity valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application with kaolin had positive effects on the total polyphenol content, with an increase over the control of 240.33% and higher antioxidant activity values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑

kaolin · quality: phytochemicals · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.