Paper · 2020 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Evaluation of herbicide efficacy on weed control and grain yield in rice field under flooded condition

Mohd Razif Abdullah; Norazua Zakaria; Muhammad Saiful Ahmad-Hamdani; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weeds listed as one of the biotic factors that increase the rice production cost worldwide. The importance of their control has always been highlighted by many researchers in years. Application of herbicides accompanied by appropriate water management can increase efficacy of weed control and consequently increase the grain and yield quality. Therefore, this investigation was carried out to assess the herbicides performance under flooded condition on weed control and grain yield in Kelantan, Malaysia. This experiment was evaluated for two seasons which are main season and off season. This experiment was performed in randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Herbicide evaluation found twelve weed species grown in the experimental plot, where Monochoria vaginalis and Echinochloa crus-galli were the most dominant weed species discovered in both seasons, followed by Leptochloa chinensis, Fimbrystylis milliacea, Ludwigia hyssopifolia, Limnocharis flava, Cyperus iria and Scirpus grossus. The herbicide treatments showed significant results in terms of weed control, grain yield and higher net benefits from economic analysis aspect. From this study, the herbicide combinations of pretilachor fb bentazon/MCPA, pretilachor+pyribenzoxim, fb bentazon/MCPA, bispyribac-sodium fb bentazon/MCPA and pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPA performed best in the flooded condition with high WCE in both seasons and pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPA resulted as the highest net benefit amongst treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monochoria vaginalis and Echinochloa crus-galli were the most dominant weed species in the rice plots in both seasons.

Interactor
Monochoria vaginalise1weed
Second interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie1weed
Outcome
most dominant weed speciese1
Setting
experimental plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · Second interactorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide evaluation found twelve weed species grown in the experimental plot, where Monochoria vaginalis and Echinochloa crus-galli were the most dominant weed species discovered in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments gave significant results for weed control and grain yield.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse2
Outcome
weed control, grain yielde2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“The herbicide treatments showed significant results in terms of weed control, grain yield and higher net benefits from economic analysis aspect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments gave higher net benefits in the economic analysis.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse2
Outcome
net benefitse2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“The herbicide treatments showed significant results in terms of weed control, grain yield and higher net benefits from economic analysis aspect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations performed best in the flooded condition with high weed control efficiency (WCE) in both seasons.

Treatment
herbicide combinationse3
Outcome
WCEe3
Direction
performed beste3
Setting
flooded conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“From this study, the herbicide combinations of pretilachor fb bentazon/MCPA, pretilachor+pyribenzoxim, fb bentazon/MCPA, bispyribac-sodium fb bentazon/MCPA and pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPA performed best in the flooded condition with high WCE in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPA gave the highest net benefit among the treatments.

Treatment
pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPAe4
Outcome
net benefite4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
amongst treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“pyrazosulfuron fb bentazon/MCPA resulted as the highest net benefit amongst treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1517 · show in text ↑

bentazone · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Pyrazosulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.