Abstract
The mango is one of the most valuable and appealing tropical fruits due to its color, aroma, tasteful remarkable flavor, and nutritive value; however, improving the yield and quality of mango is an urgent goal in order to combat global population growth. The application of amino acids and a micronutrient mixture might improve the yield and quality features but further research is still required in arid regions. To study the combined effect of a micronutrient mixture (MM) and amino acids (AA) at different rates, twenty-seven Fagri Kalan mango trees (15 years old) were carefully selected. The foliar application effect of MM and AA on vegetative growth, total chlorophyll, leaf chemical constituents, productivity, and the fruit quality of mango trees (cv. Fagri Kalan) was investigated. The findings revealed that the investigated growth measurements and leaf chemical contents, as well as the fruiting aspects and the fruit quality improved significantly due to the application of MM and AA. A higher application rate of the micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1) was the most effective combination that increased the yield, total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars (TS), and total carbohydrates by 28.0%, 3.0%, 5.8% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to untreated plants. The relationship between such characteristics revealed a strong positive correlation (0.80–0.95), confirming the importance of these materials in increasing the yield and quality of mangoes. Thus, using doses of MM and AA as a foliar spray four times during each growing season is recommended under similar environmental conditions and horticulture practices used in the current experiment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
MM and AA significantly improved mango growth measurements, leaf chemical contents, fruiting aspects and fruit quality.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- MM and AAe0
- Outcome
- growth measurements and leaf chemical contents, as well as the fruiting aspects and the fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The findings revealed that the investigated growth measurements and leaf chemical contents, as well as the fruiting aspects and the fruit quality improved significantly due to the application of MM and AA.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest MM and AA rates increased mango yield by 28.0% relative to untreated plants.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.0%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A higher application rate of the micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1) was the most effective combination that increased the yield, total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars (TS), and total carbohydrates by 28.0%, 3.0%, 5.8% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to untreated plants.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest MM and AA rates increased mango total soluble solids by 3.0%.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1)e0
- Outcome
- total soluble solids (TSS)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.0%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A higher application rate of the micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1) was the most effective combination that increased the yield, total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars (TS), and total carbohydrates by 28.0%, 3.0%, 5.8% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to untreated plants.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest MM and AA rates increased mango total sugars by 5.8%.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1)e0
- Outcome
- total sugars (TS)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5.8%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A higher application rate of the micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1) was the most effective combination that increased the yield, total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars (TS), and total carbohydrates by 28.0%, 3.0%, 5.8% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to untreated plants.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest MM and AA rates increased mango total carbohydrates by 15.0%.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1)e0
- Outcome
- total carbohydratese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15.0%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A higher application rate of the micronutrient mixture (2 g L−1) in combination with the highest amino acid concentration (2 mg L−1) was the most effective combination that increased the yield, total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars (TS), and total carbohydrates by 28.0%, 3.0%, 5.8% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to untreated plants.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield and quality characteristics showed a strong positive correlation of 0.80–0.95.
- Taxon
- mangoes
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- these materialse0
- Outcome
- yield and quality of mangoese0
- Value
- 0.80–0.95e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The relationship between such characteristics revealed a strong positive correlation (0.80–0.95), confirming the importance of these materials in increasing the yield and quality of mangoes.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend four foliar sprays of MM and AA each growing season under similar conditions.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Outcome
- using doses of MM and AA as a foliar spray four times during each growing seasone0
- Qualifier
- under similar environmental conditions and horticulture practices used in the current experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Thus, using doses of MM and AA as a foliar spray four times during each growing season is recommended under similar environmental conditions and horticulture practices used in the current experiment.”
t0“Mango”
The same questions in other papers
amino acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
micronutrient · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
micronutrient · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.