Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agriculture Food and Environment

Effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on rice yield under continuous flooding and alternate wetting and drying conditions

S. Farzana; J. R. Dey; M. Hosenuzzaman; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In rice cultivation, water and nitrogen saving strategies are becoming more crucial in order to identify efficient and useful crop production and management approaches. A study was conducted at the Soil Science Field Laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh to examine the combined effects of irrigation method and nitrogen fertilizer on yield contributing traits and yield of rice cv. BRRI dhan29. The experiment was set up in a split-plot based on a randomized complete block design with 3 replications and 14 treatment combinations. Two irrigation methods such as continuous flooding (CF) and alternate wetting and drying (AWD) were the main factor while nitrogen fertilizers including prilled urea (PU) and urea super granule (USG) were the sub-factor. The treatment T 6 (USG at 7 DAT) generated the highest plant height (cm), no. of effective tillers hill -1 , panicle length (cm), no. of grains panicle -1 , grain yield and biological yield during AWD condition. In terms of grain yield, the treatment combinations AWD + T 6 and CF + T 7 were statistically equal. In comparison to control, all AWD + USG and CF + PU treatment combinations increased straw yield and harvest index. Under both AWD and CF conditions, USG increased more grain and straw yields compared to PU. So, farmers may be advised to apply USG (216 kg ha -1 ) at 7 DAT under AWD conditions in order to improve rice yield and ensure food security.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG at 7 DAT under AWD produced the highest plant height, effective tiller number and panicle length.

Treatment
USG at 7 DATe0
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of effective tillers hill -1 , panicle length (cm)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T 6 (USG at 7 DAT) generated the highest plant height (cm), no. of effective tillers hill -1 , panicle length (cm), no. of grains panicle -1 , grain yield and biological yield during AWD condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG at 7 DAT under AWD produced the highest grains per panicle, grain yield and biological yield.

Treatment
USG at 7 DATe0
Outcome
no. of grains panicle -1 , grain yield and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T 6 (USG at 7 DAT) generated the highest plant height (cm), no. of effective tillers hill -1 , panicle length (cm), no. of grains panicle -1 , grain yield and biological yield during AWD condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD + T 6 and CF + T 7 had statistically equal grain yield.

Treatment
AWD + T 6e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
statistically equale0
Comparator
CF + T 7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of grain yield, the treatment combinations AWD + T 6 and CF + T 7 were statistically equal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD + USG increased straw yield and harvest index against control.

Treatment
AWD + USGe0
Outcome
straw yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control, all AWD + USG and CF + PU treatment combinations increased straw yield and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF + PU increased straw yield and harvest index against control.

Treatment
CF + PUe0
Outcome
straw yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control, all AWD + USG and CF + PU treatment combinations increased straw yield and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG increased grain and straw yields over PU under both irrigation regimes.

Treatment
USGe0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increased moree0
Qualifier
Under both AWD and CF conditionse0
Comparator
PUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both AWD and CF conditions, USG increased more grain and straw yields compared to PU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend USG at 216 kg ha -1 at 7 DAT under AWD for rice yield.

Outcome
apply USG (216 kg ha -1 ) at 7 DAT under AWD conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers may be advised to apply USG (216 kg ha -1 ) at 7 DAT under AWD conditions in order to improve rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.