Paper · 2021 · Water

Optimal Water-Fertilizer Combinations for Efficient Nitrogen Fixation by Sugarcane at Different Stages of Growth

Zhanxia Ma; Weixiong Wu; Juha M. Alatalo; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High fertilizer application and over-irrigation in sugarcane systems can cause considerable N2O emissions. Optimized water-fertilization management which reduces N2O emissions, while maintaining sugarcane biomass, is crucial, but may affect nitrogen fixation by sugarcane. This study evaluated the combined effect of water-fertilization on sugarcane biomass and nitrogen fixation in field trials in southern China. Treatments included drip and spray irrigation, with three levels (0% (low), 50% (medium), 100% (high)) of irrigation and of fertilizer. A rain-fed crop (no irrigation or fertilizer) was included as the control. The results showed that (1) spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilization increased biomass. The optimum combination in sugarcane elongation stage was drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilization, while drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization was the best choice for maturity stage. (2) For sugarcane nitrogen (δ15N) content, spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilization was the best combination in seedling and tillering stages. The optimum combination in the elongation stage was drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilization, and in maturity stage was drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization. (3) For soil (δ15N content), drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization proved optimal for seedling, tillering, and maturity stages. (4) In seedling stage, sugarcane (δ15N content) was found to be strongly correlated with leaf area index, soil water, soil temperature, and soil electrical conductivity. Soil (δ15N content) was correlated with photosynthesis and soil temperature. In conclusion, drip irrigation appears most suitable for field planting, while the best treatment in seedling and tillering stages is medium water-high fertilization, and that the best in elongation stage is high water-medium fertilization. The optimum water-fertilizer combinations identified here can provide a scientific basis for optimization and management of irrigation and fertilization in China and other regions with similar environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium water and high fertilizer under spray irrigation increased sugarcane biomass.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilization increased biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium water and high fertilizer under drip irrigation was optimal for biomass at elongation.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
elongation stagee0
Treatment
drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
optimum combinatione0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum combination in sugarcane elongation stage was drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water and high fertilizer under drip irrigation was best for biomass at maturity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
maturity stagee0
Treatment
drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
best choicee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization was the best choice for maturity stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilizer was best for sugarcane δ15N in seedling and tillering stages.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
seedling and tillering stagese0
Treatment
spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
nitrogen (δ15N) contente0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For sugarcane nitrogen (δ15N) content, spray irrigation with medium water and high fertilization was the best combination in seedling and tillering stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilizer was optimal for sugarcane δ15N at elongation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
elongation stagee0
Treatment
drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
optimum combinatione0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum combination in the elongation stage was drip irrigation with medium water and high fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizer was optimal for sugarcane δ15N at maturity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
maturity stagee0
Treatment
drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in maturity stage was drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizer was optimal for soil δ15N at seedling, tillering and maturity stages.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
drip irrigation with high water and high fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil (δ15N content)e0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For soil (δ15N content), drip irrigation with high water and high fertilization proved optimal for seedling, tillering, and maturity stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane δ15N content was strongly correlated with leaf area index, soil water, soil temperature and conductivity at seedling stage.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Outcome
sugarcane (δ15N content)e0
Qualifier
strongly correlated with leaf area index, soil water, soil temperature, and soil electrical conductivitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In seedling stage, sugarcane (δ15N content) was found to be strongly correlated with leaf area index, soil water, soil temperature, and soil electrical conductivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1614 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil δ15N content correlated with photosynthesis and soil temperature.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Soil (δ15N content)e0
Qualifier
correlated with photosynthesis and soil temperaturee0
Setting
soil temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil (δ15N content) was correlated with photosynthesis and soil temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended drip irrigation for field planting.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
drip irrigation appears most suitable for field plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“In conclusion, drip irrigation appears most suitable for field planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended medium water and high fertilizer at seedling and tillering stages.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
seedling and tillering stagese0
Outcome
medium water-high fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the best treatment in seedling and tillering stages is medium water-high fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended high water and medium fertilizer at elongation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
elongation stagee0
Outcome
high water-medium fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the best in elongation stage is high water-medium fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

in vitro · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 59 positive, 8 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.