Paper · 2021 · Research Society and Development

Organic onion biofortification using microalgae and humic acid

Luiz Gabriel Gemin; Gabriel Bocchetti de Lara; Átila Francisco Mógor; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biofortification can be understood as a strategy to raise nutrients levels in vegetables edible structures, which can positively interfere in human diet. Biofertilizers are an interesting option in alternative production systems, as they can increase food nutritional quality and contribute to plant development, while aiding environment sustainability as natural products. The use of microalgae and humic acid as biofertilizers points to improvements in nutrients and biomolecules content in plants, however, their combined application is still unexplored. In that scenario, it was carried a study with onions about the influence of applications via root immersion in microalgae Scenedesmus subspicatus (Sc) and humic acid (HA) solutions, analyzing possible alterations of macro and micronutrients, total sugars, reducing sugar, free total amino acids, , total soluble solids, soluble proteins and antioxidant capacity in the bulbs. Treatments consisted of one minute seedlings roots immersion from two onion cultivars in solutions containing microalgae and humic acid, and then transplanted to organic system field. There were used three concentrations: control, 0.3 g L-1 Sc + 0.3 g L-1 HA (3SH) and 0.6 g L-1 Sc + 0.6 g L-1 HA (6SH). Results show that the treatments with microalgae with humic acid association were able to increase the content of N, carbohydrates and soluble proteins, also elevating antioxidant activity in onion bulbs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microalgae with humic acid association increased the content of N, carbohydrates and soluble proteins in onion bulbs compared with control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Organ / stage
onion bulbse2
Treatment
microalgae with humic acid associatione2
Outcome
the content of N, carbohydrates and soluble proteinse2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
organic system fielde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Results show that the treatments with microalgae with humic acid association were able to increase the content of N, carbohydrates and soluble proteins, also elevating antioxidant activity in onion bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1441 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were used three concentrations: control, 0.3 g L-1 Sc + 0.3 g L-1 HA (3SH) and 0.6 g L-1 Sc + 0.6 g L-1 HA (6SH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1236 · show in text ↑
e4

“and then transplanted to organic system field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microalgae with humic acid association elevated antioxidant activity in onion bulbs compared with control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Organ / stage
onion bulbse2
Treatment
microalgae with humic acid associatione2
Outcome
antioxidant activitye2
Direction
elevatinge2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Results show that the treatments with microalgae with humic acid association were able to increase the content of N, carbohydrates and soluble proteins, also elevating antioxidant activity in onion bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1441 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were used three concentrations: control, 0.3 g L-1 Sc + 0.3 g L-1 HA (3SH) and 0.6 g L-1 Sc + 0.6 g L-1 HA (6SH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1236 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: osmolytes · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.