Paper · 2021 · Vestnik of Ulyanovsk state agricultural academy

RESULTS OF INTRODUCTION OF MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L. WHEN GRAFTING ON PUMPKIN VARIETIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE MIDDLE CIS-URAL REGION

S. A. Musikhin; A. V. Fedorov; O. A. Ardasheva

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the context of tremendous changes in the world community, one of the main factors is introduction of new plant varieties for reliable development of agriculture. To improve the quality of adaptive capabilities of thermophilic pumpkin crops in the Middle Urals, grafting on resistant stocks can be used. The studies were carried out in 2018-2020 on protected ground, at Udmurt Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the city of Izhevsk. The soil is organo-mineral, humus content is 5.0 %, pH - 5.8. The total plot area is 24 m2, the record area is 16 m2. The repetition was fourfold, the placement of the plots was randomized. The experiment is one-factor. Experimental variants are: 1. Momordica charantia L. without grafting (control), stocks - 2. Cucurbita pepo L., 3. Cucurbita maxima Duch., 4. Cucurbita moschata Duch., 5. Cucurbita ficifolia Bouche., 6. Lagenaria siceraria Molina , Standl. This work presents the stages of the study on compatibility of Momordica charantia when it was grafted onto various types of stocks, based on the analysis of the characteristics of growth and development, survival and productivity of plants. Conclusions were made about the prospects of growing Momordica charantia indoors. The data obtained indicate a high survival rate of Momordica charantia - over 72 % of the studied stocks. At the same time, it should be noted that the highest survival rate among grafts had Cucurbita maxima variant. The dry matter and total sugar content in the fruits of Momordica charantia increased in all variants with grafting (to 26.8 % by dry matter and to 16.2 % by total sugar, respectively) compared to the control, and the accumulation of nitrates was maximum - 384.6 mg / kg in the variant of grafting on Lagenaria siceraria, while there was no excess of MAC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Momordica graft survival exceeded 72% on studied stocks.

Taxon
Momordica charantiaMomordica charantiae0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Value
over 72 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high survival rate of Momordica charantia - over 72 % of the studied stocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucurbita maxima gave the highest graft survival.

Taxon
MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L.t0
Treatment
Cucurbita maxima variante0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
among graftse0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest survival rate among grafts had Cucurbita maxima variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit dry matter content to 26.8% compared with control.

Taxon
Momordica charantiaMomordica charantiae0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.8 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and total sugar content in the fruits of Momordica charantia increased in all variants with grafting (to 26.8 % by dry matter and to 16.2 % by total sugar, respectively) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit total sugar content to 16.2% compared with control.

Taxon
Momordica charantiaMomordica charantiae0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.2 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and total sugar content in the fruits of Momordica charantia increased in all variants with grafting (to 26.8 % by dry matter and to 16.2 % by total sugar, respectively) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate accumulation was maximal at 384.6 mg/kg on Lagenaria siceraria stock, without exceeding MAC.

Taxon
MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L.t0
Treatment
grafting on Lagenaria sicerariae0
Outcome
accumulation of nitratese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
384.6 mg / kge0
Qualifier
no excess of MACe0

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of nitrates was maximum - 384.6 mg / kg in the variant of grafting on Lagenaria siceraria, while there was no excess of MAC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.