Abstract
Water use (WU), water use efficiency (WUE), growth,productivity of Picual and Arbequina olive cultivars were studiedunder two irrigation systems (flood and drip) during 2007and2008 seasons.Results showed that, seasonal water use of olive trees grownunder flood and drip irrigation was 704.04 and 446.95mm/feddan/year, respectively (average of the two seasons). Olivetrees subjected to drip irrigation produced the highest yield/tree16.6 Kg (average of the two seasons). Yield decreased by about23.67% when trees were exposed to flood irrigation system. Yieldefficiency and water use efficiency of olive tress had the sametrend. The maximum values, in this respect, were obtained by olivetrees grown under drip irrigation followed in a descending order byflood irrigation, respectively.On the contrary, olive trees grown under flood irrigationsystem gave higher values of vegetative growth parameters andpercent of fruit dry weight. However, it gave less fruit yield as wellas percent of oil in flesh dry weight. Olive trees grown under drip < br />irrigation system gave the highest value of oil% per flesh dryweight (43.99% average of the two seasons). Meanwhile, thispercent decreased by about 8.54% when trees were irrigated byflood irrigation.Moreover, from the obtained data, it is clear that Picual cv. hadthat bigger tree canopy, fruit yield, fruit weight, fruit dry matterand fruit oil content more than Arbequina cv.Consequently, it could be recommended cultivate trees ofPicual cv. in the new reclaimed land as it was more suitable thanArbequina cv.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Seasonal water use of olive trees was 704.04 and 446.95 mm per feddan per year under flood and drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- flood and drip irrigatione1
- Outcome
- seasonal water usee1
- Value
- 704.04 and 446.95mm/feddan/yeare1
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e1“seasonal water use of olive trees grownunder flood and drip irrigation was 704.04 and 446.95mm/feddan/year”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation gave the highest yield per tree, 16.6 Kg.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione2
- Outcome
- yield/treee2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 16.6 Kge2
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e2“Olive trees subjected to drip irrigation produced the highest yield/tree16.6 Kg (average of the two seasons)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flood irrigation decreased yield by about 23.67% compared with drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- flood irrigation systeme3
- Outcome
- Yielde3
- Direction
- decreasede3
- Value
- 23.67%e3
- Comparator
- drip irrigatione2
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e2“Olive trees subjected to drip irrigation produced the highest yield/tree16.6 Kg (average of the two seasons)”
e3“Yield decreased by about 23.67% when trees were exposed to flood irrigation system”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield efficiency and water use efficiency were maximal under drip irrigation, followed by flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione5
- Outcome
- Yield efficiency and water use efficiencye4
- Direction
- maximume5
- Comparator
- flood irrigatione5
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e4“Yield efficiency and water use efficiency of olive tress had the same trend”
e5“The maximum values, in this respect, were obtained by olive trees grown under drip irrigation followed in a descending order by flood irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Flood irrigation gave higher vegetative growth parameters in olive trees.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- flood irrigation systeme6
- Outcome
- vegetative growth parameterse6
- Direction
- highere6
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e6“On the contrary, olive trees grown under flood irrigation system gave higher values of vegetative growth parameters and percent of fruit dry weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Flood irrigation gave a higher percent of fruit dry weight in olive trees.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- flood irrigation systeme6
- Outcome
- percent of fruit dry weighte6
- Direction
- highere6
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e6“On the contrary, olive trees grown under flood irrigation system gave higher values of vegetative growth parameters and percent of fruit dry weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation gave the highest oil percent per flesh dry weight, 43.99%.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione2
- Outcome
- oil% per flesh dryweighte7
- Direction
- higheste7
- Value
- 43.99%e7
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e2“Olive trees subjected to drip irrigation produced the highest yield/tree16.6 Kg (average of the two seasons)”
e7“irrigation system gave the highest value of oil% per flesh dryweight (43.99% average of the two seasons)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flood irrigation decreased oil percent per flesh dry weight by about 8.54% compared with drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- flood irrigatione5
- Outcome
- oil% per flesh dryweighte7
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 8.54%e6
- Comparator
- drip irrigatione2
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e2“Olive trees subjected to drip irrigation produced the highest yield/tree16.6 Kg (average of the two seasons)”
e5“The maximum values, in this respect, were obtained by olive trees grown under drip irrigation followed in a descending order by flood irrigation”
e7“irrigation system gave the highest value of oil% per flesh dryweight (43.99% average of the two seasons)”
e6“decreased by about 8.54% when trees were irrigated by”
Claim · model-written summary
Picual cultivar had a bigger tree canopy, fruit yield and fruit weight than Arbequina cultivar.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Picual cv.e1
- Outcome
- tree canopy, fruit yield, fruit weighte1
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- Arbequina cv.e2
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e1“Picual cv. hadthat bigger tree canopy, fruit yield, fruit weight”
e2“fruit dry matterand fruit oil content more than Arbequina cv.”
Claim · model-written summary
Picual cultivar had more fruit dry matter and fruit oil content than Arbequina cultivar.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Picual cv.e1
- Outcome
- fruit dry matterand fruit oil contente2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- Arbequina cv.e2
- Setting
- new reclaimed landst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e1“Picual cv. hadthat bigger tree canopy, fruit yield, fruit weight”
e2“fruit dry matterand fruit oil content more than Arbequina cv.”
Claim · model-written summary
Picual olive trees are recommended for cultivation in the new reclaimed land because they were more suitable than Arbequina.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Outcome
- cultivate trees ofPicual cv. in the new reclaimed lande3
- Setting
- new reclaimed lande3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PICUAL AND ARBEQUINA OLIVE CVS. GROWN IN NEW RECLAIMED LANDS”
e3“it could be recommended cultivate trees ofPicual cv. in the new reclaimed land as it was more suitable thanArbequina cv.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →flooding · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
irrigation · physiology: water · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.