Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Physiological characters of four lowland chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.) with root cutting

S Kusumaningrum; E Sulistyaningsih; R Harimurti; et al.

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The root system plays some vital roles in overall plant development, promoting plant anchorage, absorption of nutrients and water, and hormone production. Cutting is an attempt to root regeneration and enhance the plant's metabolism capability, including canopies and roots for high yielding. Non-hybrid chilli can be used as a model plant because Indonesia's chilli yield has not been maximal yet. This research was aimed to determine the physiological characters of four lowland chilli varieties with root cutting. This study was designed using a randomized, complete block design (RCBD) with two factors: root cutting and varieties. The root cutting factor consisted of 4 levels: root cutting in seeding, root cutting in ridging, root cutting in seedling and ridging, and non-cutting. The varieties factor consisted of 4 levels, namely Lembang, Kencana, Tanjung, dan Ungu. The results showed that root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant. However, Tanjung did not respond to root cutting treatment because it did not improve plant physiology characters and fruit yield than non-cutting treatment. It is concluded that root cutting in ridging can be improved plant physiology, which contributes to increasing yield on Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and intercellular CO2 in Kencana.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Kencanae0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellulare0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased chlorophyll accumulation and photosynthesis rate in Kencana.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Kencanae0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging improved Kencana fruit yield per plant.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Kencanae0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and intercellular CO2 in Lembang.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Lembange0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellulare0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased chlorophyll accumulation and photosynthesis rate in Lembang.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Lembange0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging improved Lembang fruit yield per plant.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Lembange0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and intercellular CO2 in Ungu.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Ungue0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellulare0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging increased chlorophyll accumulation and photosynthesis rate in Ungu.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Ungue0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting in ridging improved Ungu fruit yield per plant.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Ungue0
Treatment
root cutting in ridginge0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
non-cuttingt1

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting in ridging for Kencana, Lembang, and Ungu increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, CO 2 intercellular, chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis rate, and improved fruit yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑
t1

“and non-cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tanjung physiology and fruit yield did not improve with root cutting relative to non-cutting.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Tanjunge0
Treatment
root cutting treatmente0
Outcome
plant physiology characters and fruit yielde0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
non-cutting treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Tanjung did not respond to root cutting treatment because it did not improve plant physiology characters and fruit yield than non-cutting treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–77 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.