pruning · Yield · Capsicum (peppers)
19 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Physiological characters of four lowland chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.) with root cutting (2021)
increaseRoot cutting in ridging improved Kencana fruit yield per plant.
Identification of chili varieties (Capsicum annum) tolerance to root cutting based on stress selection indices and morphological traits planted in lowland area (2024)decreaseRoot cutting in the intolerant group caused a decrease in chili yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 9
PENGARUH PEMANGKASAN TANAMAN SENGON TERHADAP KERAGAAN TANAMAN SELA DALAM SISTEM AGROFORESTRI SENGON · 2008
- positive
- positive
Manipulation of chili plant architecture to enhance productivity and pests control · 2021
- positive
- positive
Physiological characters of four lowland chilli varieties (Capsicum annum L.) with root cutting · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
EFFECT OF PINCHING IN VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE ATTRIBUTES OF CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.) · 2022
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.