Paper · 2008 · BUANA SAINS

PENGARUH PEMANGKASAN TANAMAN SENGON TERHADAP KERAGAAN TANAMAN SELA DALAM SISTEM AGROFORESTRI SENGON

Abdul Hamid

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of pruning of Paraserianthes falcataria tree in an agroforestry system on yield of intercrops and tree performance were studied at Perhutani RPH Jatirejo, BKPH Pare, KPJH Kediri. Maize, stick nut, and chili were used as companion crops in between rows of two years old Paraserianthes falcataria tree. A split plot design with four replicates was set up for the experiment. The trees were 25%, 50% and 75% pruned. The measured parameters included growth and yield of the intercrops and performance of the tree. Results of this study showed that regular pruning of the agroforestry tree and planting of intercrops did not hinder growth and performance of the agroforestry tree, especially that was pruned 75%. Pruning of the tree also increase yield of the intercrops

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular pruning and intercrop planting did not hinder Paraserianthes falcataria growth or performance, especially with 75% pruning.

Taxon
Paraserianthes falcataria treeFalcataria moluccanae1
Treatment
regular pruning of the agroforestry tree and planting of intercropse0
Outcome
growth and performance of the agroforestry treee0
Direction
did not hindere0
Qualifier
pruned 75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Falcataria moluccana
Falcataria moluccana · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regular pruning of the agroforestry tree and planting of intercrops did not hinder growth and performance of the agroforestry tree, especially that was pruned 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“of Paraserianthes falcataria tree in an agroforestry system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased maize intercrop yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Pruning of the treee0
Outcome
yield of the intercropse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning of the tree also increase yield of the intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize, stick nut, and chili were used as companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased stick nut intercrop yield.

Taxon
stick nute1
Treatment
Pruning of the treee0
Outcome
yield of the intercropse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning of the tree also increase yield of the intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize, stick nut, and chili were used as companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased chili intercrop yield.

Taxon
chilie1
Treatment
Pruning of the treee0
Outcome
yield of the intercropse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning of the tree also increase yield of the intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize, stick nut, and chili were used as companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–247 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.