Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Novel Genetic Dysregulations and Oxidative Damage in Fusarium graminearum Induced by Plant Defense Eliciting Psychrophilic Bacillus atrophaeus TS1

Muhammad Zubair; Ayaz Farzand; Faiza Mumtaz; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study elaborates inter-kingdom signaling mechanisms, presenting a sustainable and eco-friendly approach to combat biotic as well as abiotic stress in wheat. Fusarium graminearum is a devastating pathogen causing head and seedling blight in wheat, leading to huge yield and economic losses. Psychrophilic Bacillus atrophaeus strain TS1 was found as a potential biocontrol agent for suppression of F. graminearum under low temperature by carrying out extensive biochemical and molecular studies in comparison with a temperate biocontrol model strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 at 15 and 25 °C. TS1 was able to produce hydrolytic extracellular enzymes as well as antimicrobial lipopeptides, i.e., surfactin, bacillomycin, and fengycin, efficiently at low temperatures. The Bacillus strain-induced oxidative cellular damage, ultrastructural deformities, and novel genetic dysregulations in the fungal pathogen as the bacterial treatment at low temperature were able to downregulate the expression of newly predicted novel fungal genes potentially belonging to necrosis inducing protein families (fgHCE and fgNPP1). The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1 to elicit sudden induction of plant defense, namely, H2O2 and callose enhanced activity of plant defense-related enzymes and induced over-expression of defense-related genes which accumulatively lead to the suppression of F. graminearum and decreased diseased leaf area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus atrophaeus TS1 produced hydrolytic extracellular enzymes and antimicrobial lipopeptides (surfactin, bacillomycin, fengycin) efficiently at low temperatures.

Treatment
low temperaturese1
Compound
surfactin, bacillomycin, and fengycine1
Outcome
produce hydrolytic extracellular enzymese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combat biotic as well as abiotic stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“TS1 was able to produce hydrolytic extracellular enzymes as well as antimicrobial lipopeptides, i.e., surfactin, bacillomycin, and fengycin, efficiently at low temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatment at low temperature downregulated the expression of newly predicted novel fungal genes fgHCE and fgNPP1 in F. graminearum.

Treatment
bacterial treatment at low temperaturee2
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus atrophaeus strain TS1Bacillus atrophaeuse3biocontrol_agent
Gene
fgHCE and fgNPP1e2
Outcome
expression of newly predicted novel fungal genese2
Direction
downregulatee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum is a devastating pathogen causing head and seedling blight in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–250 · show in text ↑
e2

“as the bacterial treatment at low temperature were able to downregulate the expression of newly predicted novel fungal genes potentially belonging to necrosis inducing protein families (fgHCE and fgNPP1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
e3

“Psychrophilic Bacillus atrophaeus strain TS1 was found as a potential biocontrol agent for suppression of F. graminearum under low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS1 treatment at 15 and 25 °C led to suppression of F. graminearum on wheat in pot experiments.

Treatment
TS1e5
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume4pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus atrophaeus strain TS1Bacillus atrophaeuse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
suppression of F. graminearume4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Setting
pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum is a devastating pathogen causing head and seedling blight in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–250 · show in text ↑
e3

“Psychrophilic Bacillus atrophaeus strain TS1 was found as a potential biocontrol agent for suppression of F. graminearum under low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–437 · show in text ↑
e4

“which accumulatively lead to the suppression of F. graminearum and decreased diseased leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1473 · show in text ↑
e5

“The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS1 treatment decreased the diseased leaf area of wheat infected with F. graminearum.

Treatment
TS1e5
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume4pathogen
Outcome
diseased leaf areae4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum is a devastating pathogen causing head and seedling blight in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–250 · show in text ↑
e4

“which accumulatively lead to the suppression of F. graminearum and decreased diseased leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1473 · show in text ↑
e5

“The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS1 treatment induced a sudden induction of H2O2 and callose in wheat as plant defence.

Treatment
TS1e5
Outcome
H2O2 and callosee6
Direction
sudden inductione6
Setting
pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
e6

“elicit sudden induction of plant defense, namely, H2O2 and callose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS1 treatment enhanced the activity of plant defense-related enzymes in wheat.

Treatment
TS1e5
Outcome
activity of plant defense-related enzymese7
Direction
enhancede7
Setting
pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
e7

“enhanced activity of plant defense-related enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS1 treatment induced over-expression of defense-related genes in wheat.

Treatment
TS1e5
Outcome
defense-related genese6
Direction
over-expressione6
Setting
pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The wheat pot experiments conducted at 15 and 25 °C revealed the potential of TS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1203 · show in text ↑
e6

“induced over-expression of defense-related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1377 · show in text ↑

cold · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.