Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Cell Wall Compositions of Sorghum bicolor Leaves and Roots Remain Relatively Constant Under Drought Conditions

Tess Scavuzzo-Duggan; Nelle Varoquaux; Mary Madera; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Renewable fuels are needed to replace fossil fuels in the immediate future. Lignocellulosic bioenergy crops provide a renewable alternative that sequesters atmospheric carbon. To prevent displacement of food crops, it would be advantageous to grow biofuel crops on marginal lands. These lands will likely face more frequent and extreme drought conditions than conventional agricultural land, so it is crucial to see how proposed bioenergy crops fare under these conditions and how that may affect lignocellulosic biomass composition and saccharification properties. We found that while drought impacts the plant cell wall of Sorghum bicolor differently according to tissue and timing of drought induction, drought-induced cell wall compositional modifications are relatively minor and produce no negative effect on biomass conversion. This contrasts with the cell wall-related transcriptome, which had a varied range of highly variable genes (HVGs) within four cell wall-related GO categories, depending on the tissues surveyed and time of drought induction. Further, many HVGs had expression changes in which putative impacts were not seen in the physical cell wall or which were in opposition to their putative impacts. Interestingly, most pre-flowering drought-induced cell wall changes occurred in the leaf, with matrix and lignin compositional changes that did not persist after recovery from drought. Most measurable physical post-flowering cell wall changes occurred in the root, affecting mainly polysaccharide composition and cross-linking. This study couples transcriptomics to cell wall chemical analyses of a C4 grass experiencing progressive and differing drought stresses in the field. As such, we can analyze the cell wall-specific response to agriculturally relevant drought stresses on the transcriptomic level and see whether those changes translate to compositional or biomass conversion differences. Our results bolster the conclusion that drought stress does not substantially affect the cell wall composition of specific aerial and subterranean biomass nor impede enzymatic hydrolysis of leaf biomass, a positive result for biorefinery processes. Coupled with previously reported results on the root microbiome and rhizosphere and whole transcriptome analyses of this study, we can formulate and test hypotheses on individual gene candidates’ function in mediating drought stress in the grass cell wall, as demonstrated in sorghum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused relatively minor sorghum cell wall compositional changes that varied by tissue and timing.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
cell wall compositional modificationse0
Direction
relatively minore0
Qualifier
tissue and timing of drought inductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought impacts the plant cell wall of Sorghum bicolor differently according to tissue and timing of drought induction, drought-induced cell wall compositional modifications are relatively minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused no negative effect on sorghum biomass conversion.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
biomass conversione1
Direction
no negative effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“produce no negative effect on biomass conversion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–833 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought-induced cell wall compositional modifications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell wall transcriptome HVGs varied across four GO categories with tissue and drought timing.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Gene
highly variable genes (HVGs)e1
Outcome
highly variable genes (HVGs) within four cell wall-related GO categoriese1
Qualifier
tissues surveyed and time of drought inductione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“cell wall-related transcriptome, which had a varied range of highly variable genes (HVGs) within four cell wall-related GO categories, depending on the tissues surveyed and time of drought induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many HVG expression changes had no matching physical cell wall change or opposed the predicted effect.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Gene
HVGse1
Outcome
expression changese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“many HVGs had expression changes in which putative impacts were not seen in the physical cell wall or which were in opposition to their putative impacts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most pre-flowering drought cell wall changes occurred in leaves and involved matrix and lignin composition.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
matrix and lignin compositional changese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“most pre-flowering drought-induced cell wall changes occurred in the leaf, with matrix and lignin compositional changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-flowering leaf wall changes did not persist after drought recovery.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
matrix and lignin compositional changese1
Direction
did not persiste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“matrix and lignin compositional changes that did not persist after recovery from drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most physical post-flowering cell wall changes occurred in roots, mainly affecting polysaccharide composition and cross-linking.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
roote1
Outcome
polysaccharide composition and cross-linkinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most measurable physical post-flowering cell wall changes occurred in the root, affecting mainly polysaccharide composition and cross-linking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not impede enzymatic hydrolysis of sorghum leaf biomass.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
enzymatic hydrolysis of leaf biomasse1
Direction
nor impedee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress does not substantially affect the cell wall composition of specific aerial and subterranean biomass nor impede enzymatic hydrolysis of leaf biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2122 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 5 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.