Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Absorption and use of different sources and doses of NPK in the growth of 'Capdeboscq' and 'Flordaguard' rootstocks

Renata Diane Menegatti; Aline das Graças Souza; Valmor João Bianchi

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study examined the effects of different sources and doses of fertilizers, as well as nutritional efficiency during the initial growth phase of rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Federal University of Pelotas, in a greenhouse. The experimental design consisted of completely randomized, in a three-factor scheme (2 x 2 x 4), represented by the combination of two peach rootstock cultivars (Capdeboscq and Flordaguard), two types of fertilizers (controlled release and ready availability) and four doses of fertilizer (0, 4, 8 and 12 g L−1), corresponding to a total of 16 treatments, with four replications, each including five plants. The dose of 4 g L−1 of readily available fertilizer induced superiority in the MST accumulation of the 'Capdeboscq' plants, however for the 'Flordaguard' was necessary a higher dose (8 g L−1). Higher doses than these provided a reduction in the accumulation in the phytomass, length and volume of the roots, suggesting sensitivity of the peach rootstocks to the excess of nutrients in the substrate. Despite the higher doses having induced superiority in the absorption efficiency, the lower dose (4 g L−1) of the ready-to-use fertilizer provided greater efficiency of use, which is why it is indicated for the fertilization of rootstocks, allowing greater benefit-cost. 'Capdeboscq' is suggested for use in the production of rootstocks because it exhibits greater efficiency in the use of N-P-K in view of the reduced absorption efficiency rates of these nutrients, in the lowest tested dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 4 g L−1 readily available fertilizer dose gave superior MST accumulation in Capdeboscq plants.

Material
Capdeboscqe0
Treatment
4 g L−1 of readily available fertilizere0
Outcome
MST accumulatione0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dose of 4 g L−1 of readily available fertilizer induced superiority in the MST accumulation of the 'Capdeboscq' plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstock cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flordaguard required a higher 8 g L−1 dose for superior MST accumulation.

Material
Flordaguarde0
Treatment
8 g L−1e0
Outcome
MST accumulatione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
4 g L−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the 'Flordaguard' was necessary a higher dose (8 g L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dose of 4 g L−1 of readily available fertilizer induced superiority in the MST accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–748 · show in text ↑
e2

“peach rootstock cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doses above the cultivar optima reduced phytomass accumulation, root length and root volume.

Treatment
Higher doses than thesee0
Outcome
accumulation in the phytomass, length and volume of the rootse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher doses than these provided a reduction in the accumulation in the phytomass, length and volume of the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer doses increased absorption efficiency.

Treatment
higher dosese0
Outcome
absorption efficiencye0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher doses having induced superiority in the absorption efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower 4 g L−1 ready-to-use fertilizer dose gave greater efficiency of use.

Treatment
4 g L−1e0
Outcome
efficiency of usee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
higher dosese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower dose (4 g L−1) of the ready-to-use fertilizer provided greater efficiency of use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1077 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 4 g L−1 ready-to-use fertilizer for rootstocks on benefit-cost grounds.

Treatment
4 g L−1e0
Outcome
indicated for the fertilization of rootstocks, allowing greater benefit-coste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower dose (4 g L−1) of the ready-to-use fertilizer provided greater efficiency of use, which is why it is indicated for the fertilization of rootstocks, allowing greater benefit-cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capdeboscq had greater N-P-K use efficiency despite reduced absorption efficiency at the lowest tested dose.

Material
Capdeboscqe0
Outcome
greater efficiency in the use of N-P-Ke0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
reduced absorption efficiency rates of these nutrients, in the lowest tested dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Capdeboscq' is suggested for use in the production of rootstocks because it exhibits greater efficiency in the use of N-P-K in view of the reduced absorption efficiency rates of these nutrients, in the lowest tested dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1545 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Capdeboscq for rootstock production.

Material
Capdeboscqe0
Outcome
use in the production of rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Capdeboscq' is suggested for use in the production of rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1389 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1007 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.