Paper · 2021 · Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology

ROS-Dependent Stress-Protective Effect of 24-Epicastasterone and Its Monosalicylate on Wheat Seedlings in Hyperthermia

R. P. Litvinovskaya; M. A. Shkliarevskyi; Yu. E. Kolupaev; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of 24-epicastasterone (EC) and its conjugate with the residue of salicylic acid (EC 2‑monosalicylate, ECMS) on the heat resistance of wheat seedlings are compared. The treatment of seedlings with ECMS at concentrations of 20 and 50 nM caused a more significant increase in heat resistance as compared to the action of EC, salicylic acid (SA), and a mixture of EC and SA at the indicated concentrations. A transient increase in the content of hydrogen peroxide in seedling roots under the influence of EC and ECMS was observed; in this case, the effect of ECMS was more significant. Seedling treatment with ECMS caused a more notable increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and guaiacol peroxidase) in the roots as compared to the action of EC. The effect of EC and its salicylate on the indicators of the pro-and antioxidant balance in root cell and the heat resistance of seedlings was eliminated via treatment with the antioxidant dimethylthiourea and the NADPH oxidase inhibitor imidazole. A conclusion is made about the ROS-mediated action of the studied compounds on the stress-protective systems of seedling roots. The more significant protective effect of ECMS in comparison with EC may be associated with the gradual release of SA and EC from the conjugate and the functional interaction of the signaling pathways of brassinosteroids and SA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECMS at 20 and 50 nM increased wheat seedling heat resistance more than EC, SA or their mixture.

Treatment
ECMS at concentrations of 20 and 50 nMe0
Outcome
heat resistancee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
EC, salicylic acid (SA), and a mixture of EC and SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of seedlings with ECMS at concentrations of 20 and 50 nM caused a more significant increase in heat resistance as compared to the action of EC, salicylic acid (SA), and a mixture of EC and SA at the indicated concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC transiently increased hydrogen peroxide in wheat seedling roots.

Organ / stage
seedling rootse0
Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
content of hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A transient increase in the content of hydrogen peroxide in seedling roots under the influence of EC and ECMS was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECMS transiently increased hydrogen peroxide in wheat seedling roots.

Organ / stage
seedling rootse0
Treatment
ECMSe0
Outcome
content of hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A transient increase in the content of hydrogen peroxide in seedling roots under the influence of EC and ECMS was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECMS produced a stronger root hydrogen peroxide response than EC.

Treatment
ECMSe0
Outcome
content of hydrogen peroxidee1
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
ECe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of ECMS was more significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“A transient increase in the content of hydrogen peroxide in seedling roots under the influence of EC and ECMS was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECMS increased root catalase and guaiacol peroxidase activity more than EC.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
ECMSe0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and guaiacol peroxidase)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
ECe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling treatment with ECMS caused a more notable increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and guaiacol peroxidase) in the roots as compared to the action of EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethylthiourea eliminated the effects of EC and its salicylate on root redox balance and heat resistance.

Treatment
antioxidant dimethylthioureae0
Outcome
indicators of the pro-and antioxidant balance in root cell and the heat resistance of seedlingse0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of EC and its salicylate on the indicators of the pro-and antioxidant balance in root cell and the heat resistance of seedlings was eliminated via treatment with the antioxidant dimethylthiourea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidazole eliminated the effects of EC and its salicylate on root redox balance and heat resistance.

Treatment
NADPH oxidase inhibitor imidazolee0
Outcome
indicators of the pro-and antioxidant balance in root cell and the heat resistance of seedlingse0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of EC and its salicylate on the indicators of the pro-and antioxidant balance in root cell and the heat resistance of seedlings was eliminated via treatment with the antioxidant dimethylthiourea and the NADPH oxidase inhibitor imidazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the stress protection to ROS-mediated action.

Outcome
stress-protective systems of seedling rootse0
Qualifier
ROS-mediated actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A conclusion is made about the ROS-mediated action of the studied compounds on the stress-protective systems of seedling roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The stronger ECMS protection may involve gradual SA and EC release and interacting signaling pathways.

Outcome
protective effect of ECMSe0
Qualifier
gradual release of SA and EC from the conjugate and the functional interaction of the signaling pathways of brassinosteroids and SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The more significant protective effect of ECMS in comparison with EC may be associated with the gradual release of SA and EC from the conjugate and the functional interaction of the signaling pathways of brassinosteroids and SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑

imidazole · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

antioxidant · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.