Paper · 1995 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Standardization of foliar application of molybdenum for high yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea convar botrytis var botrytis) on Alfisol of Bihar plateau

S C Kotur

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1986-92 on 'Pusa Snowball 1 ' cauliflower [Brassica oleracea L. convar botrytis (L.) Alef. Var botrytis L.) grown on a molybdenum-deficient soil to standardize the foliar application of Mo to ameliorate whiptail malady and achieve high curd yield. A significant improvement in the leaf breadth (12.0-13.3 cm), curd diameter (16.8-18.8 cm). weight(710-804 g) as well as Mo content of leaf (0.70-11.48 µg/g) was observed when ammonium molybdate was applied as foliar spray. The increase in concentration (0.05-0.2%) and number of sprays increased the Mo content of leaf but the effect of the former was significant. Application of ammonium molybdate at 0.1 % resulted in 6.87 µg/g Mo content of leaf and curd yield of 24.8 tonnes/ha. Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride) greatly increased the Mo content of leaf (11.68-12.79 µg/g) and reduced the curd diameter (16.4-17.0 cm). weight (688-703 g) and yield (17.72-17.74 tonnes/ha) compared with 4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additives (7.98 µ/g Mo, 17.8 cm, 783 g and 29.73 tonnes/ha respectively). Three sprays of 0.0125% ammonium molybdate with surfactant or humectant was as effective as 0.1 % molybdate without additives in increasing the curd yield and net returns as well as in reducing the leafy or ricey (unmarketable) curds caused by Mo deficiency. A quadratic relationship was observed between curd yield and Mo content of leaf, and on that basis the maximum curd yield occurred at 6.73 µg/g Mo in the leaf.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ammonium molybdate significantly improved leaf breadth.

Treatment
ammonium molybdatee0
Outcome
leaf breadthe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
12.0-13.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in the leaf breadth (12.0-13.3 cm), curd diameter (16.8-18.8 cm). weight(710-804 g) as well as Mo content of leaf (0.70-11.48 µg/g) was observed when ammonium molybdate was applied as foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar molybdate improved curd diameter.

Treatment
ammonium molybdatee0
Outcome
curd diametere0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
16.8-18.8 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in the leaf breadth (12.0-13.3 cm), curd diameter (16.8-18.8 cm). weight(710-804 g) as well as Mo content of leaf (0.70-11.48 µg/g) was observed when ammonium molybdate was applied as foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar molybdate improved weight.

Treatment
ammonium molybdatee0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
710-804 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in the leaf breadth (12.0-13.3 cm), curd diameter (16.8-18.8 cm). weight(710-804 g) as well as Mo content of leaf (0.70-11.48 µg/g) was observed when ammonium molybdate was applied as foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar molybdate improved Mo content of leaf.

Treatment
ammonium molybdatee0
Outcome
Mo content of leafe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
0.70-11.48 µg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in the leaf breadth (12.0-13.3 cm), curd diameter (16.8-18.8 cm). weight(710-804 g) as well as Mo content of leaf (0.70-11.48 µg/g) was observed when ammonium molybdate was applied as foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing concentration and spray number increased leaf Mo content, with a significant concentration effect.

Treatment
increase in concentration (0.05-0.2%) and number of sprayse0
Outcome
Mo content of leafe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in concentration (0.05-0.2%) and number of sprays increased the Mo content of leaf but the effect of the former was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.1% ammonium molybdate, leaf Mo content reached 6.87 µg/g.

Treatment
ammonium molybdate at 0.1 %e0
Outcome
Mo content of leafe0
Value
6.87 µg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ammonium molybdate at 0.1 % resulted in 6.87 µg/g Mo content of leaf and curd yield of 24.8 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.1% ammonium molybdate, curd yield was 24.8 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
ammonium molybdate at 0.1 %e0
Outcome
curd yielde0
Value
24.8 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ammonium molybdate at 0.1 % resulted in 6.87 µg/g Mo content of leaf and curd yield of 24.8 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding surfactant or humectant to three sprays increased leaf Mo content compared with four unamended sprays.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride)e0
Outcome
Mo content of leafe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.68-12.79 µg/ge0
Comparator
4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride) greatly increased the Mo content of leaf (11.68-12.79 µg/g) and reduced the curd diameter (16.4-17.0 cm). weight (688-703 g) and yield (17.72-17.74 tonnes/ha) compared with 4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additives (7.98 µ/g Mo, 17.8 cm, 783 g and 29.73 tonnes/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additives reduced curd diameter compared with four unamended sprays.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride)e0
Outcome
curd diametere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16.4-17.0 cme0
Comparator
4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride) greatly increased the Mo content of leaf (11.68-12.79 µg/g) and reduced the curd diameter (16.4-17.0 cm). weight (688-703 g) and yield (17.72-17.74 tonnes/ha) compared with 4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additives (7.98 µ/g Mo, 17.8 cm, 783 g and 29.73 tonnes/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additives reduced weight compared with four unamended sprays.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride)e0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
688-703 ge0
Comparator
4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride) greatly increased the Mo content of leaf (11.68-12.79 µg/g) and reduced the curd diameter (16.4-17.0 cm). weight (688-703 g) and yield (17.72-17.74 tonnes/ha) compared with 4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additives (7.98 µ/g Mo, 17.8 cm, 783 g and 29.73 tonnes/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additives reduced yield compared with four unamended sprays.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.72-17.74 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.1% ammonium molybdate with the addition of either surfactant (0.1 % wetting agent) or humectant (0.2% calcium chloride) greatly increased the Mo content of leaf (11.68-12.79 µg/g) and reduced the curd diameter (16.4-17.0 cm). weight (688-703 g) and yield (17.72-17.74 tonnes/ha) compared with 4 sprays of 0.1 % ammonium molybdate without additives (7.98 µ/g Mo, 17.8 cm, 783 g and 29.73 tonnes/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three low concentration sprays with additives matched higher concentration sprays for curd yield and net returns.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.0125% ammonium molybdate with surfactant or humectante0
Outcome
curd yield and net returnse0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
0.1 % molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.0125% ammonium molybdate with surfactant or humectant was as effective as 0.1 % molybdate without additives in increasing the curd yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentration sprays with additives reduced unmarketable curds.

Treatment
Three sprays of 0.0125% ammonium molybdate with surfactant or humectante0
Outcome
leafy or ricey (unmarketable) curdse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
0.1 % molybdate without additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of 0.0125% ammonium molybdate with surfactant or humectant was as effective as 0.1 % molybdate without additives in increasing the curd yield and net returns as well as in reducing the leafy or ricey (unmarketable) curds caused by Mo deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curd yield related quadratically to leaf Mo content, with a maximum at 6.73 µg/g.

Compound
Moe0
Outcome
curd yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.73 µg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A quadratic relationship was observed between curd yield and Mo content of leaf, and on that basis the maximum curd yield occurred at 6.73 µg/g Mo in the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑

surfactant · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

surfactant · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium molybdate · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium molybdate · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

ammonium molybdate · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.