Paper · 2023 · Food Science and Human Wellness

Transcriptomics integrated with metabolomics reveals the mechanism of CaCl 2-HCl electrolyzed water-induced glucosinolate biosynthesis in broccoli sprouts

Cui Li; Shuhui Song; Yanan He; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Glucosinolates are important phytochemicals in Brassicaceae. We investigated the effect of CaCl2-HCl electrolyzed water (CHEW) on glucosinolates biosynthesis in broccoli sprouts. The results showed that CHEW treatment significantly decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdeh yde (MDA) contents in broccoli sprouts. On the the 8th day, compared to tap water treatment, the the total glucosinolate content of broccoli sprouts with CHEW treatment increased by 10.6% and calcium content was dramatically enhanced from 14.4 mg/g DW to 22.7 mg/g DW. Comparative transcriptome and metabolome analyses revealed that CHEW treatment activated ROS and calcium signaling transduction pathways in broccoli sprouts and they interacted through MAPK cascades. Besides, CHEW treatment not only promoted the biosynthesis of amino acids, but also enhanced the expression of structural genes in glucosinolate synthesis through transcription factors (MYBs, bHLHs, WRKYs, etc.). The results of this study provided new insights into the regulatory network of glucosinolates biosynthesis in broccoli sprouts under CHEW treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CHEW treatment significantly decreased ROS and MDA contents in broccoli sprouts.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente1
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdeh yde (MDA) contentse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that CHEW treatment significantly decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdeh yde (MDA) contents in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glucosinolate content of broccoli sprouts under CHEW treatment increased by 10.6% compared with tap water.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente2
Outcome
total glucosinolate contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
10.6%e2
Comparator
tap water treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to tap water treatment, the the total glucosinolate content of broccoli sprouts with CHEW treatment increased by 10.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium content in broccoli sprouts was dramatically enhanced under CHEW treatment, from 14.4 to 22.7 mg/g DW.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente2
Outcome
calcium contente3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
from 14.4 mg/g DW to 22.7 mg/g DWe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to tap water treatment, the the total glucosinolate content of broccoli sprouts with CHEW treatment increased by 10.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–476 · show in text ↑
e3

“calcium content was dramatically enhanced from 14.4 mg/g DW to 22.7 mg/g DW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–556 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CHEW treatment activated ROS and calcium signaling pathways in broccoli sprouts, which interacted through MAPK cascades.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente4
Outcome
ROS and calcium signaling transduction pathwayse4
Qualifier
interacted through MAPK cascadese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“Comparative transcriptome and metabolome analyses revealed that CHEW treatment activated ROS and calcium signaling transduction pathways in broccoli sprouts and they interacted through MAPK cascades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CHEW treatment promoted the biosynthesis of amino acids in broccoli sprouts.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente5
Outcome
biosynthesis of amino acidse5
Direction
promotede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“CHEW treatment not only promoted the biosynthesis of amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CHEW treatment enhanced the expression of structural genes in glucosinolate synthesis through transcription factors.

Treatment
CHEW treatmente5
Gene
structural genese6
Outcome
expression of structural genes in glucosinolate synthesise6
Direction
enhancede6
Qualifier
through transcription factors (MYBs, bHLHs, WRKYs, etc.)e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in broccoli sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“CHEW treatment not only promoted the biosynthesis of amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–831 · show in text ↑
e6

“but also enhanced the expression of structural genes in glucosinolate synthesis through transcription factors (MYBs, bHLHs, WRKYs, etc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–969 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.