Paper · 2021 · Applied Sciences

Evaluation of Autonomous Mowers Weed Control Effect in Globe Artichoke Field

Lorenzo Gagliardi; Mino Sportelli; Christian Frasconi; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The development of a fully automated robotic weeder is currently hindered by the lack of a reliable technique for weed-crop detection. Autonomous mowers moving with random trajectories rely on simplified computational resources and have shown potential when applied for agricultural purposes. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of these autonomous mowers for weed control in globe artichoke. A first trial consisting of the comparison of the performances of three different autonomous mowers (AM1, AM2 and AM3) was carried out evaluating percentage of area mowed and primary energy consumption. The most suitable autonomous mower was tested for its weed control effect and compared with a conventional weed management system. Average weeds height, weed cover percentage, above-ground weed biomass, artichoke yield, primary energy consumption and cost were assessed. All the autonomous mowers achieved a percentage of area mowed around the 80% after 180 min. AM2 was chosen as the best compromise for weed control in the artichoke field (83.83% of area mowed after 180 min of mowing, and a consumption of 430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1). The autonomous mower weed management achieved a higher weed control effect (weed biomass of 71.76 vs. 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2), a lower energy consumption (430.5 vs. 1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1), and a lower cost (EUR 2601.84 vs. EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1) compared to the conventional system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All autonomous mowers mowed around 80% of the area after 180 minutes.

Outcome
percentage of area mowede0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
after 180 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the autonomous mowers achieved a percentage of area mowed around the 80% after 180 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“globe artichoke”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–70 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM2 mowed 83.83% of area after 180 minutes.

Treatment
AM2e0
Outcome
area mowede0
Value
83.83%e0
Qualifier
after 180 min of mowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM2 was chosen as the best compromise for weed control in the artichoke field (83.83% of area mowed after 180 min of mowing, and a consumption of 430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM2 consumed 430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1.

Treatment
AM2e0
Outcome
consumptione0
Value
430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM2 was chosen as the best compromise for weed control in the artichoke field (83.83% of area mowed after 180 min of mowing, and a consumption of 430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autonomous mowing reduced weed biomass relative to conventional management, 71.76 versus 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2.

Treatment
autonomous mower weed managemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
higher weed control effecte0
Value
71.76e0
Qualifier
143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autonomous mower weed management achieved a higher weed control effect (weed biomass of 71.76 vs. 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2), a lower energy consumption (430.5 vs. 1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1), and a lower cost (EUR 2601.84 vs. EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1) compared to the conventional system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“globe artichoke”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autonomous mowing reduced energy consumption relative to conventional management.

Treatment
autonomous mower weed managemente0
Outcome
energy consumptione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
430.5e0
Qualifier
1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autonomous mower weed management achieved a higher weed control effect (weed biomass of 71.76 vs. 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2), a lower energy consumption (430.5 vs. 1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1), and a lower cost (EUR 2601.84 vs. EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1) compared to the conventional system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“globe artichoke”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autonomous mowing reduced cost relative to conventional management.

Treatment
autonomous mower weed managemente0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
lowere0
Value
EUR 2601.84e0
Qualifier
EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autonomous mower weed management achieved a higher weed control effect (weed biomass of 71.76 vs. 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2), a lower energy consumption (430.5 vs. 1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1), and a lower cost (EUR 2601.84 vs. EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1) compared to the conventional system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“globe artichoke”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–70 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.