Abstract
The long-term productivity data for the energy crops under reduced inputs are decisive for farmers’ decisions. An 11-year field study was conducted in central Greece to evaluate the productivity of two cardoon varieties under reduced irrigation and weed control inputs. During the initial six plant stage ages, the cardoon total dry biomass, seed, oil and potential energy yields, averaged 21.65, 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1, as well as 364.719 GJ ha−1, respectively, with the var. C12, in most cases, the most productive. Both conditions of non-irrigation and weed competition caused a slight reduction in cardoon yield components. However, during the next five plant stage ages, the corresponding yields were dramatically reduced and averaged 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1, as well as 185.153 GJ ha−1, mainly due to reduced regrowth and the shorter height of cardoon stems. In this period, irrigation and weed management did not affect in most cases cardoon productivity. So, the under-reduced inputs cultivation of cardoon after the sixth year may not be economically acceptable for farmers. Conclusively, cardoon can be cultivated under reduced inputs, at least for 6 years, constituting one of the eligible energy crops for farmers in the hot and semi-arid Mediterranean fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
In the first six plant-stage ages, mean cardoon dry biomass yield was 21.65 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- total dry biomasse0
- Value
- 21.65e0
- Qualifier
- initial six plant stage agese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“During the initial six plant stage ages, the cardoon total dry biomass, seed, oil and potential energy yields, averaged 21.65, 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1, as well as 364.719 GJ ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first six plant-stage ages, mean cardoon seed yield was 1.92 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- seede0
- Value
- 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1e0
- Qualifier
- initial six plant stage agese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“During the initial six plant stage ages, the cardoon total dry biomass, seed, oil and potential energy yields, averaged 21.65, 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1, as well as 364.719 GJ ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first six plant-stage ages, mean cardoon oil yield was 0.53 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- oile0
- Value
- 0.53 t ha−1e0
- Qualifier
- initial six plant stage agese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“During the initial six plant stage ages, the cardoon total dry biomass, seed, oil and potential energy yields, averaged 21.65, 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1, as well as 364.719 GJ ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first six plant-stage ages, mean potential energy yield was 364.719 GJ ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- potential energy yieldse0
- Value
- 364.719 GJ ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“During the initial six plant stage ages, the cardoon total dry biomass, seed, oil and potential energy yields, averaged 21.65, 1.92 and 0.53 t ha−1, as well as 364.719 GJ ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The C12 variety was generally the most productive cardoon variety.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculust0 - Material
- var. C12e0
- Outcome
- most productivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“with the var. C12, in most cases, the most productive”
t0“cardoon”
Claim · model-written summary
No irrigation slightly reduced cardoon yield components.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Treatment
- non-irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both conditions of non-irrigation and weed competition caused a slight reduction in cardoon yield components.”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition slightly reduced cardoon yield components.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Treatment
- weed competitione0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both conditions of non-irrigation and weed competition caused a slight reduction in cardoon yield components.”
Claim · model-written summary
During the next five plant-stage ages, cardoon biomass yield fell to a mean 11.10 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculust0 - Outcome
- corresponding yieldse0
- Direction
- dramatically reducede0
- Value
- 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“during the next five plant stage ages, the corresponding yields were dramatically reduced and averaged 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1, as well as 185.153 GJ ha−1”
t0“cardoon”
Claim · model-written summary
During the next five plant-stage ages, mean cardoon seed yield fell to 0.52 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculust0 - Outcome
- corresponding yieldse0
- Direction
- dramatically reducede0
- Value
- 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“during the next five plant stage ages, the corresponding yields were dramatically reduced and averaged 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1”
t0“cardoon”
Claim · model-written summary
During the next five plant-stage ages, mean cardoon oil yield fell to 0.15 t ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculust0 - Outcome
- corresponding yieldse0
- Direction
- dramatically reducede0
- Value
- 0.15 t ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“during the next five plant stage ages, the corresponding yields were dramatically reduced and averaged 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1”
t0“cardoon”
Claim · model-written summary
During the next five plant-stage ages, mean potential energy yield fell to 185.153 GJ ha−1.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculust0 - Outcome
- corresponding yieldse0
- Direction
- dramatically reducede0
- Value
- 185.153 GJ ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“during the next five plant stage ages, the corresponding yields were dramatically reduced and averaged 11.10, 0.52 and 0.15 t ha−1, as well as 185.153 GJ ha−1”
t0“cardoon”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced cardoon regrowth and shorter stems mainly explained later yield decline.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- reduced regrowth and the shorter height of cardoon stemse0
- Qualifier
- mainly due to reduced regrowth and the shorter height of cardoon stemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“mainly due to reduced regrowth and the shorter height of cardoon stems”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation generally did not affect cardoon productivity in the later five ages.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- cardoon productivitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this period, irrigation and weed management did not affect in most cases cardoon productivity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed management generally did not affect cardoon productivity in the later five ages.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Treatment
- weed managemente0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- cardoon productivitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this period, irrigation and weed management did not affect in most cases cardoon productivity.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that reduced-input cardoon cultivation beyond year six may not be economically acceptable.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- may not be economically acceptable for farmerse0
- Qualifier
- after the sixth yeare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the under-reduced inputs cultivation of cardoon after the sixth year may not be economically acceptable for farmers.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude cardoon can be grown with reduced inputs for at least six years.
- Taxon
- cardoon
Cynara cardunculuse0 - Outcome
- cultivated under reduced inputse0
- Value
- 6 yearse0
- Setting
- Mediterranean fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cardoon can be cultivated under reduced inputs, at least for 6 years, constituting one of the eligible energy crops for farmers in the hot and semi-arid Mediterranean fields.”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
irrigation · yield · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.